Meghan Markle and the Jewish question

March 12, 2021 by Melanie Phillips -
Read on for article

Over the next few days, Tikvah and the Jewish Leadership Conference are holding their third annual symposium on Jews and conservatism, this time on Zoom.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex, Harry and Meghan Markle. Credit: ComposedPix/Shutterstock

It’s taking place when Western values are under unprecedented and ferocious assault. Everywhere, conservatives are being silenced by liberals intoxicated with their own cultural power.

Universities and high schools have morphed from crucibles of knowledge and reason into propaganda platoons indoctrinating and intimidating students into endorsing androgyny, apocalyptic climate change and hatred of capitalism, white people and the West. And, of course, bigotry against Jews and Israel is rampant.

Clearly, the West is in serious trouble. How can the Jewish people best protect themselves from this madness and continue to thrive? And what if anything can Jews do to help the wider community that is now so besieged?

Before any such suggestions can be made (I am myself working on a book about precisely this issue), it’s necessary fully to understand why we are where we are.

The cultural crisis was illuminated last week by the mutually exploitative encounter between Oprah Winfrey and the Duke and Duchess of Sussex. Many people (including U.S. President Joe Biden) hailed what they saw as the bravery of the Duchess, the former Meghan Markle, in talking about her mental health issues.

They thus appeared to see nothing wrong with her trashing her in-laws and smearing the entire British Royal Family as racist, heartless and cruel.

This reaction was morally bankrupt. If Meghan and Prince Harry are psychologically frail, that deserves sympathy. But that doesn’t excuse Meghan blaming this on an allegedly racist Royal Family (other than the Queen, whom she exempted), media and the British public.

This vague and contradictory series of smears was backed up by no evidence at all. What kind of daughter-in-law behaves like this towards her husband’s family? What kind of a son behaves like Prince Harry in making bitter accusations about his father in public?

The pair were also hypocritical in revealing the ostensible content of private conversations and making themselves the biggest story in the world, while ferociously asserting their own right to privacy.

Yet this has been lapped up uncritically by millions. Without any knowledge of the truth or otherwise of these claims, and without knowing anything about the royals other than what they’ve read in the media or from watching the often viciously fictionalized soap opera, “The Crown,” they now “know” as an unchallengeable fact that Meghan and Prince Harry have been victimized by the heartless racists of the Royal Family.

It appears that, if someone who is deemed to belong to an “intersectional” racial minority claims to be the victim of racism or to have been driven by white society to mental illness, then this must be accepted as true without even hearing the other side of the story. Indeed, there can be no other side.

Instead, it’s those who point out that the behaviour by Meghan and Prince Harry was contemptible who find their positions in jeopardy.

This has become a terrifying looking-glass world where morality has been turned back to front. It’s where in the minds of millions—particularly, the young—venality, disloyalty and spite register as evidence of moral worth.

This reversal of truth and falsehoods, justice and injustice, victim and victimizer has been accelerating over several decades.

Years ago, I realized that the onslaught against the Jewish world is deeply intertwined with the onslaught against the West. The key is Jewish values.

Although Christianity embedded those values in Western culture, it is the Mosaic codes themselves that are in the cross-hairs of those who are intent upon destroying justice, truth and sexual continence and unravelling biological identity.

One of the most fundamental of those biblical values—so egregiously absent from the behaviour of the Sussexes—is the concept of moral responsibility.

This is the duty to restrain our own wants and desires in the interests of others. This code of obligation and self-control is vital for a co-operative, generously minded and mutually respectful society. Without it, society fragments instead into hostile groups fighting for power over each other.

That’s precisely what’s happened in the West as the result of decades of assault by cultural revolutionaries. Promoting their Marxist view of the world, these have sought to replace national identity by competing factional power blocs.

Biblical morality has been junked in favour of universalizing ideologies such as moral and cultural relativism. These have replaced the notion of objective truth with subjective opinion. “What is right or true” has become “what is right or true for me”—echoed in Oprah’s grating reference to Meghan’s claims as “your truth.”

If there’s no objective truth, there can also be no such thing as a lie. That’s one reason why even verifiable factual evidence doesn’t dent the blind certainty of the Israel-haters.

All this and more has given rise to the malign madness of the culture wars. What’s less recognized, however, is the ultimate cause—the loss of belief in religion, the fundamental source of the West’s most precious values of morality and rationality.

Melanie Phillips

The secular world, including many secular Jews, tells itself the opposite. It claims that the West’s most valuable achievements, such as science and the promotion of freedom and equality, come from having dumped the Bible as mere mumbo-jumbo involving punitive codes of behaviour that destroy freedom.

On the contrary, these are values and achievements that could not have existed without Judaism and Christianity. And every one of the ideologies which has replaced the Hebrew Bible—ideologies that have helped extinguish freedom and equality and undermined scientific integrity—is anti-Judaism or anti-Israel.

Moral relativism denies the Mosaic moral codes. Egalitarianism denies the differentiation and distinctiveness that underpin the very idea of right versus wrong.

Environmentalism, which denies the superiority of humankind over the natural world, devalues humanity in favour of the planet. Materialism, or the belief that everything in the universe has a material explanation, denies the existence of God. Transnationalism dismisses the importance of the individual nation with its particular culture and laws, which is the very essence of Judaism. 

Responsibility for the crisis in the West, however, doesn’t only lie with the liberals—and liberal Jews—who subscribe to these ideas. Conservatives have conspicuously failed to fight them.

After the fall of communism, conservatives thought their anti-Western fox had been shot. They turned instead to defending liberty against the state at home. But liberty shouldn’t be an end in itself. It should be the means to a more important end: how to live a civilized life and help create a civilized society.

The failure of conservatives to understand this, coupled with their tendency to view the world through the prism of economics, meant they were largely blind to the urgent need to defend the West’s core values of individual and collective moral responsibility.

When the culture war against the West morphed into a lifestyle free-for-all and the growth of identity politics, these so-called conservatives gave up and decided to go with the flow.

In general, observant Jews tend to be politically conservative. So are some religiously liberal Jews, but these are vastly outnumbered by politically liberal Jews who are either secular or are trying to refashion Judaism itself into a secular and liberal Golden Calf.

The challenge for Jewish conservatives is to find the language to reclaim and communicate Jewish values to both the Jewish and non-Jewish world, and to use these values to drive the defence of the Western nation and its culture against the forces that seek to obliterate it through the moral chaos we now see all around us.

Melanie Phillips, a British journalist, broadcaster and author, writes a weekly column for JNS. Currently a columnist for “The Times of London,” her personal and political memoir, “Guardian Angel,” has been published by Bombardier, which also published her first novel, “The Legacy.” Go to to access her work.


7 Responses to “Meghan Markle and the Jewish question”
  1. Jewish Values says:

    I did not enjoy this writing piece — why would a Jewish person advocate for Western values they are not Jewish values — reality check —

  2. Rabbi Chaim Ingram OAM says:

    Thank you again Melanie Phillips for not giving up the struggle to re-set our moral compass aright.

  3. Liat Kirby says:

    It might be difficult to take back the narrative, but it’s very important to try to do so. People as individuals can make a difference, if passionate enough and determined.

    This is an important article by Melanie Phillips, liberating in itself for the depth and breadth it covers in discussion of morality, for the courage exemplified in speaking out with objectivity and fuller truth in mind. Populism and superficiality are rife in the way that so many now make their judgements, and the judgements are so quickly formed, with such little actual information. People are happier judging rather than learning. If you’re not in the right victim group, you’re out – you don’t deserve a say, or respect of any kind.

    Harry and Meghan have burst forth with their truth, their sense of entitlement (which relates to perceived hurt and injury), their sense of relief in at last speaking out. However, it’s not enough. And they’re not at this time able to see that. The bigger picture matters, other truths of those they malign require expression for a fuller picture (and this won’t occur given the Royal Family do not mix the personal with the public). In time everything becomes relative, and although Meghan might end with no regrets, I think it highly possible Harry will have regrets. Anyway, that is their business. It’s a pity they had to make it the world’s in order to make themselves feel better.

    I look forward to the time when Jewish ‘thinking’ and the fine morality that goes with that is to the fore, creating understanding and unity in such a way that being religious or secular, liberal or orthodox, is not the point. Rather, morality and honesty on a wider scale than the personal prevails in such a way that we can learn how to be. Will that time come? We must work toward it or it won’t.

  4. Lynne Newington says:

    This racial nonsense regarding Prince Harry and wife has been taken completely out of context.
    Certainly not conducive of the prince we know to embarrass his family especially his devoted grandmother.

  5. Michael Burd says:

    It’s a bit difficult for Jewish conservatives to take back the narrative when the majority of Jewish diaspora organizations in USA and Australia have surrendered to liberalism or progressivism and other shades of Left
    This ideology not only adopts woke ism but anti Zionism . This leftist ideology is being pushed at school level to university and promoted by the majority of Jewish orgs and Jewish media .

Speak Your Mind

Comments received without a full name will not be considered
Email addresses are NEVER published! All comments are moderated. J-Wire will publish considered comments by people who provide a real name and email address. Comments that are abusive, rude, defamatory or which contain offensive language will not be published

Got something to say about this?

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.