Gutteres and UN puts Israel on a black list

May 29, 2026 by Mike Wagenheim - JNS
Read on for article

U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres is “disconnected from reality” after his office made the “political” decision to place Israel on a “list of shame” of parties suspected of committing sexual violence in conflict, according to Danny Danon, Israeli ambassador to the global body.

Israeli Ambassador to the United Nations Danny Danon during a visit of U.N. Secretary General António Guterres at the Yad Vashem Holocaust Memorial in Jerusalem on Aug. 28, 2017. Credit: Yonatan Sindel/Flash90.

Danon said on Thursday that the Jewish state is freezing relations with the secretary-general’s office.

“We are done with this U.N. secretary-general,” he said.

The global body putting Israel on the list is “a moral disgrace that proves that Guterres has lost all credibility,” the Israeli envoy added.

The list includes Hamas and Islamic State—“the most depraved terrorist organizations in the world,” Danon said.

The Israeli envoy said that the Jewish state submitted evidence and detailed responses to U.N. allegations and invited representatives of the global body to examine the situation on the ground. The United Nations declined the invitation, he said.

Stéphane Dujarric, spokesman for Guterres, told JNS that “we’ve seen the comments.”

“For our part, the secretary-general’s door remains open,” Dujarric said.

He downplayed Danon’s announcement, which he characterised as “more symbolic than anything,” and told JNS that “we will continue to work with the Israeli mission, as we do with the other 192 missions.”

JNS sought comment from the Israeli mission about what the envoy’s announcement means practically.

Guterres’s second and final term concludes at year’s end. His replacement has not yet been chosen.

Ties between Israel and Guterres have been particularly strained in the aftermath of the Hamas-led terrorist attacks in southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, after which the secretary-general was seen widely as having tried to justify the terror attacks. Israel has since declared him persona non grata.

Last year’s sexual violence in conflict zones report included Hamas on the list of parties “credibly suspected of committing or being responsible for patterns of rape or other forms” of conflict-related sexual violence.

Pramila Patten, Guterres’s special representative on that topic, said at the time that Hamas committed systematic sexual violence on Oct. 7 and against hostages held in Gaza thereafter.

Analysts have noted that anti-Israel activists have been pressuring Patten to add Israel to the list, especially in the wake of Hamas’s placement, in the name, according to the anti-Israel actors, of being balanced.

The Australia/Israel & Jewish Affairs Council (AIJAC) condemned the “unconscionable and morally bankrupt decision of the United Nations and Secretary-General Antonio Guterres to place the Israel Prison Service (IPS) on the same blacklist as Hamas, ISIS and other terrorist entities accused of systematic sexual violence in conflict zones.”

Executive Director Dr Colin Rubenstein said: “This disgraceful equivalence marks yet another appalling low for a UN system consumed by relentless institutional anti-Israel bias. To compare the democratic State of Israel – with its independent judiciary, robust legal safeguards and mechanisms to investigate allegations of wrongdoing – with Hamas terrorists who systematically weaponised rape, sexual torture and mass murder on October 7, is utterly repugnant and inexcusable.

This shameful move does nothing to advance human rights or protect victims of sexual violence, but merely further weaponises international institutions for political purposes. We call on the Australian Government to unequivocally reject this defamatory decision and demand accountability from a UN system that has once again betrayed its founding principles.”

The Zionist Federation of Australia CEO, Alon Cassuto, said the decision represented a profound moral failure.
“This decision rests on a grotesque false equivalence between Hamas, which systematically employed rape, sexual torture and other forms of sexual violence as weapons of war during its October 7 massacre, and Israel, a democratic state governed by the rule of law, judicial oversight and accountable institutions.”
He added: “Any credible commitment to human rights requires distinguishing between a terrorist organisation that weaponises sexual violence as a matter of policy and a democratic state that investigates and prosecutes wrongdoing through established legal processes. By erasing that distinction, the UN is diminishing the gravity of Hamas’ crimes and failing the victims of the sexual atrocities committed on October 7.”
This is not a contribution to the fight against sexual violence in conflict. It is a politicised act that undermines the credibility of international human rights mechanisms and forms part of a broader pattern of efforts within the UN system to single out and delegitimise the State of Israel.”
The UN’s role should be to uphold universal standards and make clear moral distinctions. Equating Israel with terrorist organisations that systematically weaponise sexual violence does the opposite and diminishes the gravity of those crimes.”

JNS with J-Wire





Speak Your Mind

Comments received without a full name will not be considered
Email addresses are NEVER published! All comments are moderated. J-Wire will publish considered comments by people who provide a real name and email address. Comments that are abusive, rude, defamatory or which contain offensive language will not be published

Got something to say about this?

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Discover more from J-Wire

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading