Experts debate whether protests can change Iran

January 7, 2018 by Ariel Ben Solomon -
Read on for article

Amid the continued popular protests throughout Iran, what will the future hold for the country’s terror-funding Shi’a regime?…asks Ariel Ben Solomon/

Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei speaks in Iran’s Kermanshah Province in November 2017. Credit: via Wikimedia Commons

“The bottom line: Does the regime have both the will and ability to keep itself in power? If it lacks both, it is finished. If it has either, it should be able to weather this crisis,” Dr. Harold Rhode, a former adviser on Islamic affairs in the U.S. Department of Defence and now a distinguished senior fellow at the Gatestone Institute think tank, told JNS.

Ephraim Dardashti, who was born and raised in Iran and now lives in the U.S., and is a published expert on Iranian history, told JNS that usually at this time of year, Iran’s government “is organising parades boasting their support for the [ayatollah] and cursing the Americans and Israelis, so in essence these spontaneous demonstrations are counter-demonstrations and show how the people truly feel.”

Iran analyst Ali Alfoneh, author of the 2013 book “Iran Unveiled: How the Revolutionary Guards is Transforming Iran from Theocracy into Military Dictatorship,” told JNS that the regime “seems in control.” There is unrest in poor suburbs of urban population centers, but important cities such as Tehran, Isfahan and Tabriz were calm this week, he said.

“The Iranian authorities have for the most part dealt with the protests and have not found it necessary to resort to even more violent methods such as massacring the protesters,” said Alfoneh, who grew up in Tehran.

The regime’s methods of control

Dardashti explained that there are three main tactics the Islamic Republic uses to control and pacify its population: drugs, sex and fear.

Illegal drugs are widely available and very cheap in Iran, “from the old-time opium that the grandparents used to smoke, to crack packed in a glass container ready for consumption,” Dardashti said.

Iranian women are widely used as “sexual toys,” according to Dardashti.

“When they visit the homeland, Iranian-American men indulge—they ‘marry’ someone for the duration of their stay,” he said. In Shi’a Islam, there is a concept of temporary marriage known as mut’a.

To instill fear among the population, Iranian clergy have consistently killed dissidents from the start of the Islamic Revolution. Grand Ayatollah Hossein Ali Montazeri, the anointed successor to Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, was deposed after criticising the regime’s tactics.

What is behind the protests?

Behnam Ben Taleblu, an Iran analyst at the Foundation for ariel  of Democracies think tank, told JNS that while the protests “initially began over economic grievances, they soon mushroomed across Iran, drawing on the wellspring of discontent with the revolution that has existed in that country since the regime’s inception.”

“Chants drifted to include attacks on both President [Hassan] Rouhani and Supreme Leader [Ayatollah Ali] Khamenei, as well as rebukes of Iran’s overall foreign and security policy,” he said. “These slogans signal the deep levels of dissatisfaction the population has with the regime.”

Dardashti said Iran’s kleptocracy has played a major role in the public’s dissatisfaction with the regime.

“The corruption is so bad and widespread that hardly a day goes by without more revelations,” he said, noting that former President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has traded barbs with judiciary chief Sadeq Larijani and his brother, the Iranian parliament’s Speaker Ali Larijani, accusing one another of corruption and sedition.

Many have observed that the current demonstrations are starkly different than the 2009 “Green Revolution” protests that were mainly carried out by young and affluent Iranians in large cities such as Tehran.

“What is noticeably different about these protests when compared to 2009 is the size and scope,” Ben Taleblu said. “While in 2009, protests in Tehran were in the millions, today’s protests are noticeably smaller, but wider in scale. Protests began in the holy city of Mashhad, Iran’s second-largest city, and among the urban poor. That should be counted as part of the social base of the regime—but no longer.”

Despite their geographic and demographic differences, Ben Taleblu does see a connection between the protests of 2009 and 2017.

“These protests build on the ones from 2009, since those grievances have simply compounded with age,” he said. “And despite the aforementioned differences, they represent the Iranian people’s resolve for representative government, economic and social justice, and a government that reflects their values and interests.”

What happens if the regime collapses?

Dardashti said that if the Iranian regime falls, a new government would likely align itself with the West. On the other hand, he said the leadership vacuum could be filled by a Marxist Iranian opposition that is currently exiled in France and is partially represented by the People’s Mujahideen Organisation of Iran (PMOI), which has been removed from the official U.S. list of terrorist organisations, but remains controversial due to its radical ideology. Dardashti expressed concern that the PMOI might currently be the best-organized Iranian opposition movement.

Ben Taleblu said, “It’s too soon to tell what direction these protests may take. But regardless of their perceived success or failure, they show the international community that the Iranian people are willing to risk their life for their beliefs, and for the future of their country.”

—With reporting by Sean Savage


One Response to “Experts debate whether protests can change Iran”
  1. Adrian Jackson says:

    For any change the protesters need to have the bulk of the army on side like in the USSR (in Moscow) and Romania a few decades ago.

    The Syrian protesters had little army support and that is why the protests failed, large swathes of the country is in ruins and millions are displaced.

    Russian assistance to Assad in the last few years helped him to victory too as the fighting until then was at a stalemate.

    Deceased China communist Mao Tse Tung (how we spelt his name in the 1960’s) once said “political power comes out of a barrel of a gun” as we all now know.

    The first USA civil war in 1776, what they call the “War of Independence”, was only won by Washington continental army with the help of the French kings army and navy.

    Washington would have lost without the French kings help who incidentally the USA failed to help a few decades later during the French revolution. So much for supporting your allies.

Speak Your Mind

Comments received without a full name will not be considered
Email addresses are NEVER published! All comments are moderated. J-Wire will publish considered comments by people who provide a real name and email address. Comments that are abusive, rude, defamatory or which contain offensive language will not be published

Got something to say about this?

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.