Stone Cold Justice – the ZFA has its say – Take 2

February 12, 2014 by  
Read on for article

Dealing with Palestinian minors who take up rocks as weapons against Israeli citizens and soldiers in the West Bank is a very complex and multi faceted problem. 

From: Philip Chester – President – Zionist Federation of Australia

Philip Chester

Philip Chester

The Four Corners’ program ‘Stone Cold Justice’ (10/02/14) aired on ABC was highly emotive and one sided and failed the test of unbiased independent reporting on which the ABC prides itself.

Putting to one side the question of why it is that children as young as five are permitted if not encouraged to be out on the streets in deliberate, violent confrontations with the authorities, the underlying premise of John Lyon’s piece – equality of treatment before the law for Palestinians and Israelis- is as he well knows impossible given the disputed status of the territories in which the Palestinians live.  If Israel attempted to apply its civil law in those territories no doubt Lyons and most of the world’s media and political leadership would scream about the defacto annexation of the territories and the elimination of any prospect of peace based on the establishment of a Palestinian state in those territories.

Lyons also chose to portray the issue as relating to “children” using the most extreme examples of young children to illustrate his story.  The reality is that the vast majority of under age offenders are teenagers and young adults.  Would anyone seriously contend that a 16 or 17 year old who hurls rocks at cars travelling at speed with intent to kill or maim should not be dealt with to the full extent of the law?  Are our memories so selective that we do not recall the fear and the hue and cry that went up around Melbourne when kids were hurling rocks from overpasses on the Eastern Freeway a few short years ago?  Lyons also fails to note that many Israelis who travel the roads in or near the West Bank are forced to do so in vehicles that have been modified with shatter proof windscreens so as to provide at least a modicum of safety for those motorists.  Sadly such measures are not foolproof as the mounting toll of injury and death testifies.

Israel is not perfect and it cannot be sensibly argued that it is beyond reproach.  Where Israel distinguishes itself on this issue is that it has actively engaged with UNICEF and made a number of changes to its policies and procedures so as to provide an improved system for dealing with this very difficult problem.  UNICEF’s initial report of March 2013, notes that Israel has been working closely with UNICEF and has been reviewing UNICEF recommendations in a serious and comprehensive manner.  Unlike most if not all of the other countries in the region, Israel has the transparency and willingness to confront past mistakes and the courage to genuinely and meaningfully change.  Lyons omitted any mention of UNICEF’s latest report dated October 1 2013 which clearly highlights the vast improvements made by Israel through the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Israel Defence Forces.  Israel has established a special military court for juveniles, raised the age of minority to 18 (from 16) so as to accord young offenders more rights than their adult counterparts, shortened the timeframe for detention prior to a young offender being brought before the courts and provided critical court documents in Arabic to assist offenders understand and meet the charges against them.  Undoubtedly further improvements can and will be made as Israel balances its security needs against the need to minimise the impact on the civilian population of the  territories.

At its core the lack of a balanced exploration of the issues is the most problematic aspect of the Four Corners’ piece which really does little more than recycle John Lyons’ magazine article on the same subject from 2011.  To take the principal Israeli commentator from the extreme right of the settlement movement was a deliberate choice designed to limit information and discussion on the issues and to give a negative portrayal of the Israeli position.  Attempts to minimise or erase the severity of the crimes perpetrated by Palestinian minors and their adult role models work against an enduring solution and the establishment of an environment in which such a solution can thrive.

 

Comments

5 Responses to “Stone Cold Justice – the ZFA has its say – Take 2”
  1. Gil Solomon says:

    Phillip,

    I endorse Otto’s comments and would add that to me you represent the apologetic, cringing ghetto Jew, too fearful to get up off his knees and stand up straight.

    Your comments: “Israel is not perfect and it cannot be sensibly argued that it is beyond reproach” said especially at a time in history like this, makes it plain for all to see that you are incapable of representing Israel’s case in any convincing, forceful and meaningful manner.

    As ZFA President, your reference to “disputed status of the territories” implies that the so called “Palestinian” narrative is not fiction, when in reality, fiction it is. The only thing going for these people is that they are dealing with Jews who should never have indulged their ludicrous claims from day one. As Israel gets blamed for whatever it does anyway, forget about civil law being applied in Judea and Samaria, the only law that should be applied is martial law, with all this entails.

    It’s time to open up the electoral process within the ZFA and bring in new leadership blood from the outside in the hope that maybe it will attract Jewish leadership that can truly make a difference.

    • Brian Rom says:

      Mr Leibler in his comment posted on 12 Feb pointed out that the program contained “gratuitous references to alleged Biblical promises or political machinations … included in a manner which seemed designed to incite prejudice and contempt”.

      This was in reference to Mr Lyons’ interview with the settler lady who said that Palestinians had no right to land in the West bank as it all belonged to the Jews, a view that I’m assuming you strongly endorse.

      I hope you’re not going to suggest that Mr Leibler also be replaced ?

  2. I agree with all these points.
    i have written to the ABC in relation to the program and raised the issue of ABC bias.
    I feel to blindly criticize the program would be unhelpful, so I have asked why the ABC does not produce a program regarding the political brainwashing of the Palestinians of their own children against Israel and the Jewish people.
    this also must clearly be defined as child abuse and in the face of constant criticism of perceived bias, the ABC should have some duty to air such a program. I’m sure most of us Jews have a treasure trove of clips showing how the Palestinians train their children to hate

  3. Otto Waldmann says:

    Some people never learn, do they !!!

    Philip you are so right and just because you mentioned it here, on this topic, at this juncture when Israel is being unfairly criticised – AGAIN !!! -, tell us more about how Israel is not perfect and how it is not beyond reproach !!!! Perfect timing !!!

    TIME TO GO PHILIP, TIME TO GO !!!!!!!!

Speak Your Mind

Comments received without a full name will not be considered
Email addresses are NEVER published! All comments are moderated. J-Wire will publish considered comments by people who provide a real name and email address. Comments that are abusive, rude, defamatory or which contain offensive language will not be published

    Rules on posting comments