Distinguishing Between Critics and Adversaries…writes Isi Leibler

August 6, 2013 by Isi Leibler
Read on for article

We are a passionate people and, when engaged in political disputations, frequently cross the boundary of civil discourse. I could personally testify to this were I to air some of the more vulgar verbal outpourings directed against me by extremists from both sides of the political spectrum.

Isi Leibler

Isi Leibler

For many years the far left has employed smear tactics to discredit and demonize its opponents, depicting them as anti-democratic, racist and bigoted. The principal proponents continuously employ inverse McCarthyism to serve their purposes. Yet their influence has dramatically eroded in recent years, as Israelis have given up their illusions, becoming increasingly aware of the true nature of our Palestinian “peace partner.”

Conversely, in recent months, increasing numbers of passionate activists on the far right have displayed outbursts of blind rage, indiscriminately characterizing all those with whom they disagree as self-hating anti-Zionists. In so doing, they have lost the ability to distinguish between Israel’s well intentioned (sometimes delusional) critics and its enemies.

Take for example the virulent attacks on Abe Foxman, National Director of the Anti-Defamation League who has been accused of treachery and cowardice. On many occasions I have publicly disagreed with Foxman’s approach to various issues. But that does not detract me from recognizing him as a champion of the Zionist enterprise, one of a small group of Jewish leaders who, whenever the chips are down, can be counted upon to support Israel.

Another case is that of David Harris, Executive Director of the American Jewish Committee (AJC), one of American Jewry’s most prominent organizations. Harris has recently been castigated for criticizing Israeli government ministers who have called for annexation of the territories. Despite the fact that Harris’ remarks have effectively endorsed official government policy, critics have demonized him as an anti-Zionist and accused him of being in the camp of far left Jewish anti-Israel organizations such as J Street.

Whilst the AJC was lukewarm in its approach to Zionism prior to the establishment of the Jewish state, today, with Harris at its helm, it is totally committed to Israel. Harris, a consummate Zionist with deep personal connections to Israel, has never deviated from promoting the cause of the Jewish state both in the United States and abroad, as his columns and radio broadcasts attest.

Then there is the case of Alan Dershowitz. Earlier this year at a Jerusalem Post-sponsored conference in New York, Dershowitz expressed controversial views about the peace process that he had formulated in talks with Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas. Many, myself included, considered his proposed approach utterly flawed. But it surely did not warrant the jeering he received at the conference, or a subsequent bombardment of vulgar and defamatory comments – including accusations that he is an enemy of the Jewish people.

Some of us may strongly disagree with aspects of Dershowitz’s political approach. But the fact remains that that he has devoted much of his life to Israel advocacy and has contributed far more to defending Israel’s right to exist than all his critics combined. It is shocking to see such a person treated in this shameful manner, especially by activists purporting to represent Israel’s national camp.

These examples of poor judgment and a gross lack of civility pale to insignificance when considering the manner in which those purporting to be Israel supporters have recently defamed British journalist and icon of Diaspora Zionism, Melanie Phillips. In a column, unequivocally condemning the British government for barring anti-Jihadi activist Pamela Geller and globally recognized Islamic scholar Professor Robert Spencer from entering the UK, Phillips cited examples of the government’s hypocrisy – including the  liberal approach it adopted toward visiting Moslem hatemongers actively engaged in inciting hatred against Jews and others. Yet, Phillips also suggested that Geller and Spencer made a tactical error by addressing the English Defense League (EDL), which, she noted, is perceived by many to be xenophobic and racist. (EDL leader Tommy Robinson has a criminal record, and formerly was an active member of the anti-Semitic, fascist British National Party.) While Phillips supported those fighting Islamic fundamentalism, she wisely warned that “the enemy of our enemy is not necessarily our friend.”

Phillips’ remarks unleashed a series of hysterical condemnations. She was assailed for seeking to ingratiate herself with the British elite, for being unprincipled, and for showing signs of cowardice. Regrettably, Spencer and Geller supported these verbal attacks.

Melanie Phillips is renowned in the UK for courageously standing up to those unwilling to confront Islamic fundamentalism. Her book, Londonistan, is a classic study of how London has become a hub for the promotion, recruitment and financing of Islamic terror and extremism. The British establishment has deemed her Islamophobic (as it does all critics of radical Islam) – a sure sign that she is on the right track.

The flood of abuse Phillips endured for having expressed concern about associating with questionable groups like the EDL exemplifies an increasing lack of sophistication and lack of civility among groups purporting to defend Israel’s interests. In their ideological extremism, Phillips’ critics failed to understand her argument that if we align ourselves with racists, we undermine our credibility in the struggle against Islamic fundamentalism and provide grist for the propaganda mills of our enemies. Like those attacking Foxman, Harris and Dershowitz, they mistake disagreement for antagonism.

No matter with whom we are engaged in political debate, we must actively listen, grasp nuanced and multi-layered arguments, and restrain ourselves from making snap judgments so that we can appropriately distinguish between well-intentioned critics and true adversaries. If not, we will expend our energies fighting within and will misdirect our outrage towards Israel supporters whose views differ from ours. Let us have the patience, sound judgment and civility to recognize friend from foe, and appropriately concentrate our efforts to stave off the destructive forces working against us.

Isi Leibler lives in Jerusalem. He is a former president of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry.

Comments

2 Responses to “Distinguishing Between Critics and Adversaries…writes Isi Leibler”
  1. Otto Waldmann says:

    Dear David
    “The” Singer I know and respect is quite different to most of the personalities Isi is defending.
    Precisely because Isi is being fair and comprehensive in presenting the contradictions that eventuated in his subjects’ public record, one can only conclude that those Isi considers unfairly treated have, in fact – and in writing – oscilated in their position toward a subjectmatter, i.e. Israel, which “some” ( i.e those savage critics ) have decided to treat with unflinching consistency.
    The same Singer you are reffering to has been, in my experience, one of the most reliable, most consistent commentators cum defenders of all matters Zionist.
    You ought to be the singer of his praises !

  2. david says:

    Isi is spot on.

    Here is a list of personal abuse I have copped following one article written by me and recently published on another web site

    1. “Alert, alert, be on your guard!

    When the Singer starts attacking Abbas and Erekat you know that there is more dirty work being done at the crossroads!’

    2.”Looks to me like the Americans have at long last tired of feeding this lot like Singer who they have kept afloat under pressure with no reciprocity.’

    3. “So far you’ve demonstrated you anti-Arab racism,”

    4. ” If you ever develop a defence of Zionism that isn’t based on ethno-religious chauvinism and anti-Arab racism I’d be very interested to read it, although I think that it would be in the nature of a Zen exercise.

    5. “In total contrast to the guy who merely collects brownie points with the Hasbara lie factory..”

    6. “Dear Mr Troll”

    7. “Is asking him again and demanding his identity (“you need to amswer” FFS) just accumulating Hasbara score points or some sort of hectoring lawyer stuff? You’re not in Israel now, feller”

    8. “Are you an armchair Zionist or have you been a member of the IDF, or would you join the organisation in the future? Treat that as rhetorical, I really can’t be bothered any more. Next round, please lift your game.”

    These kind of ad hominem attacks are all made under the cover of anonymity and contribute nothing to any discussion of the subject matters contained in my articles – either as to their accuracy or the conclusions that I draw.

    I know that I could complain to the editor to have these posts deleted as being personal attacks on me and intended to degrade and vilify.

    I have not taken that action as I feel people need to know the depth of racial hatred present in this country. Let no -one believe it is not out there in all its hatred and vitriol.

    I have of course responded when I have felt necessary to do so.

Speak Your Mind

Comments received without a full name will not be considered
Email addresses are NEVER published! All comments are moderated. J-Wire will publish considered comments by people who provide a real name and email address. Comments that are abusive, rude, defamatory or which contain offensive language will not be published


    Rules on posting comments