Jordan and Israel now the only viable two-state solution

February 3, 2021 by David Singer
Read on for article

The Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) has unequivocally confirmed its rejection of an independent demilitarised State proposed by President Trump in:

  • Gaza
  • About 70% of Judea and Samaria (West Bank) and
  • Parts of Israel’s sovereign territory.

PLO representative – Riad Malki – told the Security Council on 26 January 2021:

“It is our collective responsibility to salvage the two-State solution on the pre-1967 borders before it is too late.”

Malki was blatantly lying to the Security Council.

There were no “pre-1967 borders” – only “1949 Armistice lines” – the Armistice Demarcation Lines negotiated after the 1948 attack on the newly declared State of Israel by Egypt, Jordan, Iraq, Syria, and Lebanon— as designated in agreements between:

  • The Government of Egypt and the Government of Israel dated 24 February 1949
  • the Government of the Hashemite Jordan Kingdom and the Government of Israel dated 3 April 1949

(Armistice Agreements)

Article VI (9) of the Jordan/Israel Armistice Agreement provided:

“The Armistice Demarcation Lines defined in articles V and VI of this Agreement are agreed upon by the Parties without prejudice to future territorial settlements or boundary lines or to claims of either Party relating thereto.”

Article V (2) of the Egypt/Israel Armistice Agreement provided:

“The Armistice Demarcation Line is not to be construed in any sense as a political or territorial boundary, and is delineated without prejudice to rights, claims and positions of either Party to the Armistice as regards ultimate settlement of the Palestine question.

Armistice Demarcation Lines are not borders.

That the UN Security Council accepted the repetition of this drivel by Malki –without seeking its correction – is indicative of the Security Council’s continuing bias against the Jewish people.

Furthermore the PLO was only created in 1964 – when article 24 of its founding Charter declared:

“This Organization does not exercise any regional sovereignty over the West Bank in the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, on the Gaza Strip … Its activities will be on the national popular level in the liberational, organizational, political and financial fields.”

This wording was dropped when the PLO Charter was revised in 1968 – after Jordan had lost Judea and Samaria (West Bank) and East Jerusalem and Egypt had lost Gaza – territories they were both respectively occupying under the Armistice Agreements prior to their entering the 1967 Six Day War.

The revised article 24 read:

“The Palestinian people believe in the principles of justice, freedom, sovereignty, self-determination, human dignity, and in the right of all peoples to exercise them.”

Sovereignty in the territories covered by the Armistice Agreements was amazingly being claimed by the PLO – when it was not in 1964.

Malki’s plea to the Security Council further falsified the historical and geographical facts:

“Israel’s goal has always been the same: grabbing maximum Palestinian geography with minimum Palestinian demography.

It was Jewish geography not Palestinian geography – recognition having been given by the League of Nations in 1922 to the right of the Jewish People to reconstitute the Jewish National Home in Judea and Samaria (West Bank) and Gaza – their ancient and biblical homeland – pursuant to Article 5 of the Mandate for Palestine – a right preserved until today by article 80 of the United Nations Charter.

The PLO and the United Nations “two-state solution” has reached a dead end.

The only viable two-state solution to ending Jewish and Arab claims in Judea and Samaria (West Bank) and Gaza are direct negotiations between Israel and Jordan – the two successor States to the 1922 Mandate for Palestine and the two signatories to their 1949 Armistice Agreement.

A two-state solution based on fiction can never beat a two-state solution based on fact.

David Singer is a Sydney lawyer and a foundation member of the International Analysts Network

Author’s note: The cartoon – commissioned exclusively by the author —is by Yaakov Kirschen aka “Dry Bones”- one of Israel’s foremost political and social commentators – whose cartoons have graced the columns of Israeli and international media publications for decades. His cartoons can be viewed at


3 Responses to “Jordan and Israel now the only viable two-state solution”
  1. Paul Winter says:

    Israel and Jordan are at peace (sort of). The PA will not commit political hara-kiri (and lose its access to privileges and self-enrichment) for the sake of peace, nor will it divest itself of its delusion to be leading the jihad against Jews holding mohammedan lands. But there is another aspect: the Jews in Samaria and Judea will not live under any rule other than that of Israel. The Palestinian Arabs lost, Jordan de-naturalised them, so a solution, other than the “two-state” one needs to be found for their remaining in some half dozen population centres in Israel.

  2. Beer baron says:

    The two-state solution is a textbook example of Orwell’s “doublethink” on a grand political scale.

  3. Eion Isaac says:

    Even AntiZionists of the 1920’s and 1930’s acknowledged the right of all peoples to escape Genocide and to be given safe refuge in the still vast empty spaces of the Earth including the Ancient Holy Land
    But the Nazi factions within the Palestinian Arab People notoriously Amin El Husayni
    actively blocked the escape from Genocide and many stood idly by .
    The International Humanitarian Compensation is the Right of Return of all Jewish People to the still Empty Spaces of the Holy Land .

Speak Your Mind

Comments received without a full name will not be considered
Email addresses are NEVER published! All comments are moderated. J-Wire will publish considered comments by people who provide a real name and email address. Comments that are abusive, rude, defamatory or which contain offensive language will not be published

Got something to say about this?

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.