18C: Coalition to Advance Multiculturalism disappointed

March 3, 2017 by J-Wire Staff
Read on for article

The Coalition to Advance Multiculturalism has expressed disappointment that the report released following the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Right’s inquiry in to freedom of speech lacks a firm recommendation calling for the retention of Section 18C in its current form.

The retention of Section 18C in its current wording is a position supported by the overwhelming majority of the faith, ethnic and Indigenous communities of Australia, and reflected in the overwhelming majority of submissions received by the inquiry.
In a statement the organisation said: “The Coalition draws some comfort from the fact that there has been no specific recommendation calling for the amendment of Section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act. Additionally, the Committee appears to have provided recommendations in respect of the processes of the Australian Human Rights Commission, which is essential to invest the Commission with public trust.
Having said that, while the Committee has confined itself only to listing a range of ‘options’ – the amendment, repeal, or retention of 18C – it has in the process provided the misleading impression that these options share equal validity.
We will oppose any such response to amend or repeal Section 18C on the part of any member of parliament, with all the energy and resources at our disposal. Australia’s multiracial character is set in stone. Australia’s social cohesion therefore depends on a multicultural framework which promotes trust between all Australians. Section 18C strengthens this multicultural framework. At its essence, Section 18C reinforces the prevailing communal standard that racial and religious abuse is a pernicious force which divides and weakens our society, while striking an appropriate balance with our freedom of expression.
Racial and religious vilification violates the dignity of Australians, inhibits their ability to participate in Australian communal life, and severely damages the social fabric which is the indispensable bedrock on which are built our freedoms and civil liberties.
Any political party or member of parliament that puts freedom of speech above freedom from racial abuse or vilification does not have the concerns of the people of Australia at heart, especially the overwhelming majority of faith, ethnic and Indigenous communities.
We are pleased to report to the 100 signatories of our submission that the work of our Coalition has had an impact, with our submission and testimony being cited multiple times in the report.
There is still work for us to do. Now more than ever we must continue to advocate for robust legislation and institutions that afford effective protection from racial and religious vilification, and increase public understanding of the Racial Discrimination Act.”


3 Responses to “18C: Coalition to Advance Multiculturalism disappointed”
  1. Adrian Jackson says:

    18C should be repealed by the Commonwealth Parliament.

    If someone defames you then take them to court if you are confident of winning.

    As far is I know only right wing journalist Andrew Bolt and a student in a QLD university have been taken to court so the legislation is pointless.

    The QLD matter was thrown out of court by the judge last week I understand and the proponents of the court case paid costs I think.

    If someone in your presence says something you dont like; in a cafe or even at home, just point out to them that the comment is not on.

    Problem solved without all the silly legislation.

    Small government not large government is best.

  2. Ron Burdo says:

    Not in my name.

    Stop this childish self-victimization. This is not 1950.
    No to restrictions on criticising groups.
    Yes to freedom of speech.

  3. Adrian Jackson says:

    Australian dont care about 18C and will continue to say what they like, when they like.

Speak Your Mind

Comments received without a full name will not be considered
Email addresses are NEVER published! All comments are moderated. J-Wire will publish considered comments by people who provide a real name and email address. Comments that are abusive, rude, defamatory or which contain offensive language will not be published

    Rules on posting comments