European Union Suffers Continuing Backlash Over Racist Labelling Laws…writes David Singer

December 23, 2015 by David Singer
Read on for article

The Czech Parliament’s lower House – by an overwhelming majority with all parties except the Communists supporting it – has joined fellow European Union (EU) members – Greece and Hungary – in urging the Czech Government to refuse implementing EU racist and discriminatory labelling laws for Jewish goods produced in Judea and Samaria (the West Bank), East Jerusalem and the Golan Heights.

Czech Culture Minister Daniel Herman said  that it was:

“absolutely necessary to reject the efforts to discriminate against the only democracy in the Middle East.”

Another Czech politician Frantisek Laudat argued that the guidelines:

 “may evoke awkward reminiscence of marking Jewish people during World War II.”

The Czech Assembly declared the new EU guidelines were:

“motivated by a political positioning versus the State of Israel.”

That political positioning has seen the EU:

  1. Claim that settlement by Jews in Judea, Samaria and East Jerusalem is illegal in international law despite the provisions of article 6 of the Mandate for Palestine and article 80 of the United Nations Charter specifically authorising and preserving the rights of Jews to live there for the purpose of reconstituting the Jewish National Home.
  2. Engage in supporting unauthorised, unapproved and surreptitious Arab building projects in Area “C” in Judea and Samaria where administrative and security control is solely vested in Israel under the Oslo Accords.
  3. Ignore that Jews lived in these self-same designated areas for generations before being driven out and ethnically cleansed by six Arab armies in 1948 – resulting in these areas being illegally annexed and occupied by Jordan between 1948 and 1967.

To add to the EU’s current woes and expose the hypocrisy of these labelling regulations – the EU’s second highest judicial body – the General Court – has determined that the 2012 fishing agreement between the EU and Morocco must be annulled because it also applied to the Western Sahara – disputed territory under Morocco’s control since 1976.

The court cited United Nations resolutions classifying the Western Sahara as occupied – faulting the EU for pursuing its agreement with Morocco without making any distinction concerning products manufactured in the Western Sahara.

Although there are some 200 areas of disputed territory around the world – the EU has seen fit to only require special labelling laws for Jewish goods originating from territories disputed between Jews and Arabs.

The EU is considering an appeal.

The ire of the US Congress has now also been raised.

Representative Nita Lowey (Democrat) sponsored the introduction of the following resolution into the House of Representatives on 16 December – which has now been referred to the House Foreign Affairs Committee:

“H.Res. 567: Expressing opposition to the European Commission interpretive notice regarding labeling Israeli products and goods manufactured in the West Bank and other areas, as such actions undermine efforts to achieve a negotiated Israeli-Palestinian peace process.”

Numerous attempts by Secretary of State John Kerry to bring about a negotiated “two state solution” – first laid out in the 2003 Bush Roadmap – have come to nought.

These discriminatory labelling regulations must materially affect any future negotiations and the opportunity for the first time in recorded history to create a second Arab State – in addition to Jordan – within the territory covered by the Mandate for Palestine.

The EU cannot realistically cancel these regulations – given the anger and resentment such back down would engender in the Arab world.

Such blatant anti-Jewish bias ends the EU playing a constructive role in influencing any division of these territories between their Arab and Jewish claimants.

The EU instead finds itself being increasingly labelled with a particular odium and tainted reputation because of these malicious regulations.

David Singer is a Sydney Lawyer and Foundation Member of the International Analysts Network


3 Responses to “European Union Suffers Continuing Backlash Over Racist Labelling Laws…writes David Singer”
  1. Paul Winter says:

    If Israeli “leaders” took the EU to court and the court wasn’t biased against Israel, the EU regulations (read antisemitism) would be ruled unlawful and the mohammedan regimes could not protest.

    There are two problems:
    1) the EU is run by post-modern bureaucrats rather than by elected officials and consequently it is biased against democracies, holding Western white societies guilty for all the world’s ills
    2) a spineless appeasing Knesset that tolerates foreign interference. Israel should long ago have banned all EU sponsored development in Area C and of EU funding of NGOs that attack Israel. But an Israel that would assert its sovereignty would also be one that would go into Judea and Samaria and kick out the arrogant totalitarian kleptomaniacs who have now declared a State of Palestine thus terminating the PA with which Israel had some agreement.

    • david singer says:


      “The mohammedan regimes could not protest?”

      You must be joking.

      They do not accept binding international law by simply declaring it to be “null and void” when it suits them.

      Take article 20 of the PLO Charter:
      “The Balfour Declaration, the Mandate for Palestine, and everything that has been based upon them, are deemed null and void.”

      And the stupid West breaks bread with these serial law breakers, supports their racist claims about Jews having no legal right to live in Judea and Samaria and provides guards of honour and welcoming ceremonies as they fly into town.

      Go figure …

  2. Sheree Rihari says:

    Good for them. Some commonsense at last!

Speak Your Mind

Comments received without a full name will not be considered
Email addresses are NEVER published! All comments are moderated. J-Wire will publish considered comments by people who provide a real name and email address. Comments that are abusive, rude, defamatory or which contain offensive language will not be published

Got something to say about this?

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.