Antisemitism landmark case in the UK

March 8, 2017 by  
Read on for article
In a landmark judicial review action brought by Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA), the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has been forced to revisit its decision not to prosecute a neo-Nazi leader, Jeremy Bedford-Turner.

Brian Kennelly QC (leading counsel), David Sonn (solicitor),
Gideon Falter (claimant and Chairman of CAA), and Jamie Susskind (junior
counsel).
Photo Nathan Lilienfeld

The CPS had repeatedly refused to prosecute him.

In a speech to neo-Nazis surrounded by police in July 2015, Bedford-Turner said that: “…all politicians are nothing but a bunch of puppets dancing to a Jewish tune, and the ruling regimes in the West for the last one hundred years have danced to the same tune.”
Evoking medieval libels which claimed that Jews drank the blood of non-Jewish children, Bedford-Turner told his followers, of whom one third were from the violent extreme-right National Rebirth of Poland group, that the French Revolution and both World Wars were massacres perpetrated by Jews.
He concluded that England was “merry” during the period of the expulsion of Jews from England and demanded: “Let’s free England from Jewish control.”
The speech was filmed and posted on YouTube, where it remains.
The CPS took over five months to decide not to prosecute the case, deciding that there was no realistic prospect of a jury finding that Bedford-Turner’s speech amounted to incitement to racial or religious hatred (using threatening, abusive, or insulting words or behaviour with the intention (or likely consequence) of stirring up racial or religious hatred).

CAA’s Chairman, Gideon Falter, who had witnessed the speech, applied for Victims’ Right to Review, but was told by the CPS that he was not a victim and had no victim’s rights. Faced with no alternative, CAA took the unusual step of issuing judicial review proceedings to submit the CPS decision to the scrutiny of the High Court.

CAA was partly motivated by a growing concern that the CPS is failing to take antisemitic crime seriously. 2015, the year in which the crime was committed, was the worst year on record for antisemitic hate crime. Yet of 15,442 prosecutions of hate crimes by the CPS, only 12 were prosecutions of antisemitic hate crime.
Whilst waiting for the High Court to decide whether to allow CAA to proceed, the case was brought to the attention of the Director of Public Prosecutions and the Chief Executive of the CPS.
On 6th January 2017, the Hon. Mr Justice Haddon-Cave gave CAA’s judicial review permission to proceed on all grounds and limited CAA’s cost liability to zero. He held that this case “raises potentially important issues for society in this growing area of racist and religious hate crime.” The case was expedited to be held before a Divisional Court of the Administrative Division of the High Court on Wednesday 8th March.
On the eve of the hearing, after more than a year of maintaining that her decision was correct, the Director of Public Prosecutions agreed that the decision should be quashed and taken again by a more senior lawyer.
The Director of Public Prosecutions’ capitulation comes as a representative survey of 1,864 British Jews found extremely low confidence in the CPS and the authorities. CAA’s 2016 Antisemitism Barometer research has not yet been  published, however CAA has released the results from the research pertaining to confidence in the CPS:
  • Only 26% of British Jews think the CPS does enough to protect British Jews.
  • Only 23% of British Jews think that the authorities are doing enough toaddress and punish antisemitism.
  • Only 46% of British Jews have confidence that if they reported a hatecrime, it would be prosecuted if there was enough evidence.
CAA was represented pro bono by leading counsel Brian Kennelly QC, junior counsel Jamie Susskind, and solicitor David Sonn.

 

Gideon Falter, Chairman of Campaign Against Antisemitism said: “We are delighted by this result, but for more than a year it has been clear that the DPP could not win. It is a disgrace that we have had to litigate for the DPP to reconsider the absurd decision not to prosecute this brazen neo-Nazi.
The question now is why the CPS seems to demonstrate such incompetence in dealing with cases of antisemitism. Despite record levels of antisemitic crime, there are dismally few prosecutions of antisemites in Britain every year. Antisemites are becoming bolder and British Jews are losing faith in the authorities. The CPS must stop making excuses and prosecute antisemites with zero tolerance. If they do not, we will continue to hold them to account in court.”
Brian Kennelly QC, leading counsel in the judicial review, said: “The CPS has acknowledged that in future it must apply Article 17 of the European Human Rights Convention in cases of antisemitic hate speech. This provides that the right to free speech does not extend to those who would destroy that right.”

Comments

One Response to “Antisemitism landmark case in the UK”
  1. Bella Ceruza says:

    More and more ‘civilized western societies’ feel like 1939 revisited.

    I wait to see what the ultimate decision will be. If Nazism (why is it called ‘neo’?…. it’s not new, it’s the same old same old that has never ceased) wins, then the Nazis boast about how right they are and if common sense wins, the Nazis continue to boast that Jews run the world. Frankly I wish we did run the world! If we did, it would be a far better place.

Speak Your Mind

Comments received without a full name will not be considered
Email addresses are NEVER published! All comments are moderated. J-Wire will publish considered comments by people who provide a real name and email address. Comments that are abusive, rude, defamatory or which contain offensive language will not be published

    Rules on posting comments