5 Responses to “On Galus Australis”
  1. michael says:

    I wait for the day a Palestinian/ Arab conference invites Israeli Zionist Politicians to express their views ..

    The fringe Jewish progressives are the best advocates the Palestinians and Arabs have at their disposal.

  2. jake says:

    Well said Otto!!

  3. Otto Waldmann says:

    JStreet is unhappy with EVERYTHING Zionist and “Galus Australis” would be the ideal hosts for any putrid and noxious stuff undermining genuine Zionist views.

    Otherwise, Alex is doing Fein and vice versa.

    • Sam says:

      That this web site would give oxygen to Galus Australis is beyond belief.

      As someone elsewhere so aptly stated

      “Our very own Jewish Australians for Palestine”

      • Otto Waldmann says:

        Sorry Sam, I beg to differ
        as the first to be black balled by the new management at Galus, in a very unfair manner, I can tell you that Jwire are offering a valuable oportunity to those who wish to argue in a decent way with Galus about issues Galus would not allow to be aired on their site.
        Even when Frosh was ruling the site one was not allowed to express dissaproval to the way Galus would see “wise” to run the site. They pretended that there was a “distinct” tread where one could argue policy matters and even then you could not tell them, even most politely, what you thought. The Fein gang do it in a strict fascist fashion. They cut you off under the offensive “reason” that you are either “offensive” in language, “obnoxious” etc. In a way they insult you in a libelous way, considering that , in my case, my name was being publicly besmirched by inference. Jwire offer here the important and decent oportunity to describe Galus’ offensive behaviour and this is, most definitely, NOT providing them oxygen.
        Galus are a dedicated platform for views typical of the Aust. Jewish Democratic defamers of Israel, a voice for the NIF type opinions etc.
        They do allow certain people with oposing views, such as Michael Burd, to publish there simply because this would farcically indicate that they are”balanced” and also because Michael’s reputation is far too important to be taken on frontally, as they have done with me or, indeed, Shirlee Finn, another one banned for no reason, except that she is also quite forward in criticising the ideologies Galus promote.
        Galus is, in any case, a very insignificant site. I counted the number of regular contributions on their site and it has a dismal average, some 1.8 comments per topic and that is against a very small number of topics, roughly a tenth of Jwire’s , for instance. Yet they need to be exposed as an active forum promoting views inimical to the mainstream Jewish positions.

Speak Your Mind

Comments received without a full name will not be considered
Email addresses are NEVER published! All comments are moderated. J-Wire will publish considered comments by people who provide a real name and email address. Comments that are abusive, rude, defamatory or which contain offensive language will not be published

Leave a Reply to jake Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.