Israel rejects genocide accusations at World Court
Israel has rejected as “a grossly distorted story” accusations brought by South Africa at the United Nations’ top court that its military operation in Gaza is a state-led genocide campaign aimed at wiping out the Palestinian population.
Internation Court of Justice
South Africa, which filed the lawsuit at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in December, asked judges on Thursday to impose emergency measures ordering Israel to immediately halt the offensive.
It said Israel’s aerial and ground offensive – which has laid waste to much of the narrow coastal enclave and killed more than 23,000 people according to Gaza health authorities – aimed to bring about “the destruction of the population” of Gaza.
Israel on Friday rejected the accusations of genocide as baseless and called on the court to reject South Africa’s demands for an immediate end to its military campaign in the Gaza Strip.
“The application and request should be rejected for what they are – a libel,” Israel’s foreign ministry legal adviser Tal Becker told the ICJ.
It said South Africa was acting as a mouthpiece for Islamist Hamas, which seeks Israel’s destruction and is widely designated as a terrorist group in the West.
Israel’s military actions in Gaza were acts of self-defence against Hamas and “other terrorist organisations”, Becker said at the opening of the second day of hearings at the World Court.
He said South Africa’s interpretation of events was “grossly distorted”.
“If there were acts of genocide, they have been perpetrated against Israel,” he said.
By asking the court to order the halt of the Gaza military operation “the applicant seeks to thwart Israel’s inherent right to defend itself … and render Israel defenceless”, he said.
Israel launched its all-out war in Gaza after a cross-border rampage on October 7 by Hamas militants in which Israeli officials said 1200 people were killed, mainly civilians, and 240 taken hostage back to Gaza.
Palestinian backers with flags marched through The Hague and planned to watch proceedings on a giant screen in front of the Peace Palace.
Israeli supporters were holding a gathering of family members of hostages taken by Hamas.
The ICJ’s decisions are final and without appeal – but the court has no way to enforce them.
The 1948 Genocide Convention, enacted in the wake of the mass murder of Jews in the Nazi Holocaust, defines genocide as “acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group”.
Since Israeli forces launched their offensive, almost all of Gaza’s 2.3 million people have been driven from their homes at least once, causing a humanitarian catastrophe.
Post-apartheid South Africa has long advocated the Palestinian cause, a relationship forged when the African National Congress’s struggle against white-minority rule was cheered on by Yasser Arafat’s Palestine Liberation Organisation.
The court is expected to rule on possible emergency measures later in January, but will not rule at that time on the genocide allegations – those proceedings could take years.
AAP
It’s right these allegations could take years……
*OAU commission into genocide.
Africa Recovery, Vol.14#2 (July 2000), Briefs page
The Rawanda case is just one example, where Belgium, UN secretariat and particularly the “Roman Role” singled out for condemnation.
The role they played certainly something to write home about..