Student debate turns ugly

December 14, 2015 by Julian Kowal
Read on for article

A debate on “ethno cultural policy” at last week’s National Union of Students (NUS) Conference nearly ended in violence after it was hijacked by an aggressive group of far-left student delegates.

Debate turns nasty

Debate turns nasty


The group had controversially put forward a motion art the conference held at Melbourne’s Mannix College that referred to Israel as “an apartheid state” and accused it of “ethnic cleansing”. It said that in the event of future hostilities between Israel and its neighbours, regardless of which side is at fault, “NUS will issue statements in solidarity with the Palestinian people” and “will take steps to enact, where practicable, a boycott of Israel”.

A conservative Palestinian student, a member of the Liberal club, was due to speak against the motion, but was prevented from doing so when some of the far-Left delegates stormed the stage, stole the microphone from his hand and moved a gagging motion against his right to speak. A number of NUS Delegates have also charged that proponents of the motion used gross racist language during the course of the melee.

“The supporters of the motion yelled the words ‘Jew’ and ‘Ashkenazi Jews’ as terms of abuse”, AUJS National Political Affairs Director, Julian Kowal said. “Their speech and behaviour was indistinguishable from that of the antisemitic fascist student unions of an earlier era.”

Malcolm Turnbull meets AUJS's Julian Kowal

Malcolm Turnbull meets AUJS’s Julian Kowal

“Overt Anti-Semitism could not be expressed in more simple terms than using the term “Jew” with the intention to defame or insult another individual.”“AUJS is deeply concerned that the NUS conference is a space in which students feel comfortable to use “Jew” as an insult

According to Kowal, Jewish students have been harassed, abused and assaulted numerous times at several Australian campuses in recent years. He named the University of Sydney as one of the worst for Jewish students. “We are simply not free to express our opinions if we support Israel, or even to wear clothing that identifies us as Jewish – some Jewish students have been abused, identifiable only by their religious head-covering”, he said.

“We report all assaults and incidents of harassment and intimidation, and the University authorities have admitted that they have a problem with racism and intolerance of so-called ‘non-radical’ views on campus, but they have done nothing to address this poisonous culture. There is a growing feeling of isolation amongst Jewish students.

“This motion is just the tip of the iceberg.” Kowal lashed the supporters of the motion as “people who cannot handle contradiction”. He accused them of “having a simplistic, reductionist mindset”.

“The fact that they had to resort to violent behaviour and overt racism, and censored a student from speaking in order to get their motion passed, shows that they are cowards who are afraid of the truth.

University authorities should not allow anybody, especially these fanatics, to behave as self-appointed censors and arbiters of ‘correct opinion’ on campus.”.


5 Responses to “Student debate turns ugly”
  1. Jan Poddebsky says:

    When I visited the temples of Khajuraho, India and saw the erotic carvings there,I was surprised how small they were and it occurred to me that the British ladies with the vapors over the statues had to get up really close and peer at them to be offended.
    At the entrance to the Kemp lecture at Sydney University which was similarly disrupted earlier this year I asked a pamphleteer at the entrance to the lecture: why don’t you boycott this lecture?
    Same question for the far left: why don’t they boycott the campus conferences and lectures they find so irritating? I will not be offended if they don’t make an appearance.

  2. Paul Norton says:

    The Honi Soit (Sydney University student newspaper) blog on the NUS conference basically confirms this report, although its main emphasis was on Socialist Alternative silencing Palestinian students who didn’t agree with them.

  3. Ron Burdo says:

    Anti Israel is Anti Semitism for intellectuals.

  4. Henry Herzog says:

    Overt racism? Blatant anti-Semitism, and there’s no mistake about that. These actions had nothing to do with these p..cks supporting Palestinians: it was an example of the far-left fascists hate of Jews. It’s in their bloody genes.

Speak Your Mind

Comments received without a full name will not be considered
Email addresses are NEVER published! All comments are moderated. J-Wire will publish considered comments by people who provide a real name and email address. Comments that are abusive, rude, defamatory or which contain offensive language will not be published

Got something to say about this?

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.