UN Special Rapporteur incites hatred towards the Jewish People
Michael Lynk – UN Human Rights Council Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian Territory occupied since 1967 – has issued an explosive anti-Jewish statement that fails to acknowledge the Jewish People have any vested legal and human rights claims to reconstitute the Jewish National Home in Judea and Samaria.
Lynk’s statement is the latest in a steadily-growing outpouring of hatred towards the Jewish people – that could lead to violence between Jews and Arabs as the 1 July date of destiny approaches for restoring Jewish sovereignty in about 30% of Judea and Samaria after 3000 years.
Couched entirely in the language of the enemies of the Jewish People – Lynk uses the terms:
- “annexation” instead of “restoring Jewish sovereignty”
- “West Bank” instead of “Judea and Samaria”
Lynk lays the groundwork for inflaming violent Arab responses with this highly-exaggerated claim:
“Israel’s decision to unilaterally march ahead with the planned annexation on July 1 undermines human rights in the region, and would be a severe body blow to the rules-based international order”
Israeli sovereignty will be applied in about 1697 km2 – approximating 30% of Judea and Samaria -where 65000 Arabs – 4% of Judea and Samaria’s Arab population – live.
Lynk then misleadingly states:
“It would also further undermine any remaining prospect for a just and negotiated settlement”
Rubbish.
Sovereignty in the remaining 70% – 3958 km2 – home for 96% of Judea and Samaria’s Arab population – will be allocated in direct Israeli-Arab negotiations.
Lynk continues:
“If Israel’s annexation plans proceed, what would be left of the West Bank would become a Palestinian Bantustan, an archipelago of disconnected islands of territory, completely surrounded and divided up by Israel and unconnected to the outside world”
Lynk makes this sensational claim without having seen the actual joint US-Israel Mapping Committee proposals.
Certain to inflame Arab passions is Lynk’s assertion:
“The plan would crystalize a 21st century apartheid, leaving in its wake the demise of the Palestinians’ right to self-determination. Legally, morally, politically, this is entirely unacceptable.”
The 65000 Arab residents affected will acquire Israeli residency rights.
Lynk’s claim that “apartheid” will be the outcome of Israel’s decision is outrageous.
Lynk’s use of the term “annexation” throughout his statement becomes clear as he continues his diatribe:
“Annexation has been strictly prohibited under international law since the adoption of the Charter of the United Nations in 1945. Drawing from the bitter lessons of two world wars fought within a generation, the international community outlawed annexation because it generates conflict, vast human suffering, political instability, economic ruin and systemic discrimination.”
Israel’s decision does not involve “annexation” but “restoring Jewish sovereignty in Judea and Samaria” in accordance with the following legal authorizations:
- San Remo Resolution 1920
- Treaty of Sevres 1920
- League of Nations Mandate for Palestine 1922
- Article 80 UN Charter
Lynk’s annexation-phobia continues unabated:
“The looming annexation is a political litmus test for the international community. This annexation will not be reversed through rebukes, nor will the 53-year-old occupation die of old age”
Lynk concludes:
“As I stated in March, the international community should review its extensive menu of sanctions and countermeasures to stem this march towards further illegality. Settlement products should not enter the international marketplace. Agreements, existing and proposed, with Israel should be reviewed.”
There is no illegality – only legality heaped on legality.
The 30% of Judea and Samaria to become part of Israel is the Jewish People’s biblical and ancestral heartland. Lynk’s attempt to erase its Jewish patrimony is disgraceful.
Lynk’s refusal to acknowledge Jewish claims in Judea and Samaria smacks of unadulterated Jew-hatred, will incite violence against Jews and should be roundly condemned.
David Singer is a Sydney lawyer and foundation member of the International Analysts Network
Author’s note: The cartoon – commissioned exclusively for this article—is by Yaakov Kirschen aka “Dry Bones”- one of Israel’s foremost political and social commentators – whose cartoons have graced the columns of Israeli and international media publications for decades. His cartoons can be viewed at Drybonesblog
UN bodies, like this absurdly named one, given its anti-human rights agenda, and in particular, their personnel, have a vested interest in inciting hatred against Jews.
It is one of the strategies which they use to create the illusion that they actually fulfil some useful function to justify the fat budgets and fat salaries/sinecures which they enjoy.