Comments on: Racial Discrimination Act: A word from the Attorney-General https://www.jwire.com.au/racial-discrimination-act-a-word-from-the-attorney-general/ Australia, NZ and worldwide Jewish news that matters Thu, 28 Nov 2013 11:35:55 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 By: Otto Waldmann https://www.jwire.com.au/racial-discrimination-act-a-word-from-the-attorney-general/#comment-56490 Thu, 28 Nov 2013 11:35:55 +0000 http://www.jwire.com.au/?p=38594#comment-56490 So, EVERYBODY, by George Brandis, there will be freedom of expression/speech, but if that speech is in breach of the “racial vilification” laws, then legal action is legitimate and its succcess guaranted by the same law.
So we have:
“A” – free to express anything, including racial vilifiction

and

“B” legal protection against racial vilification.

So, “B” trumps “A” or “A” and “B” are inclusive in syntax, but exclusive in Law.
This is consistency by entrapment.
Could I be right that, if a person vilifies on account of race, religion, the DPP would not commence action but the offended party could !!?? In this case could other laws be accepted as contiguous??

Is there a lawyer in the house !!!!!!!!!!!???

]]>