<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Providing for Holocaust survivors	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.jwire.com.au/providing-for-holocaust-survivors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.jwire.com.au/providing-for-holocaust-survivors/</link>
	<description>Australia, NZ and worldwide Jewish news that matters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2015 23:13:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Robert Schwartz		</title>
		<link>https://www.jwire.com.au/providing-for-holocaust-survivors/#comment-155709</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert Schwartz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2015 23:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jwire.com.au/?p=54373#comment-155709</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[No doubt benefit has flowed to survivors of the Shoah as a result of Claims conference action but criticism of the organisation and its members is not &quot;recent&quot;. It goes back at least to the early 1990s where accusations of lack of governance and of funds  misappropriation were made. 

The Claims Conference members made public their view that others were more deserving of the recovered property than the survivors descendents. From my own experience, during the process of recovering property in Berlin on behalf of my mother, it was only the threat of legal action which convinced the Claims Conference staff to withdraw a counterclaim for the property.

There was and still is no excuse which condones the alleged behaviour  of these people, the more so as the ranks of survivors and their descendents thin with the passing of time.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No doubt benefit has flowed to survivors of the Shoah as a result of Claims conference action but criticism of the organisation and its members is not &#8220;recent&#8221;. It goes back at least to the early 1990s where accusations of lack of governance and of funds  misappropriation were made. </p>
<p>The Claims Conference members made public their view that others were more deserving of the recovered property than the survivors descendents. From my own experience, during the process of recovering property in Berlin on behalf of my mother, it was only the threat of legal action which convinced the Claims Conference staff to withdraw a counterclaim for the property.</p>
<p>There was and still is no excuse which condones the alleged behaviour  of these people, the more so as the ranks of survivors and their descendents thin with the passing of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: www.jwire.com.au @ 2026-04-18 06:13:07 by W3 Total Cache
-->