Palestine – Morsi Minces Two-State Solution…writes David Singer

January 24, 2013 by David Singer
Read on for article

Any hope of a negotiated two-state solution being achieved under the Oslo Accords and the Bush Road Map has been blown away following the publication of statements made by Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi in September 2010 – which have recently surfaced and come back to haunt him in January 2013.

President Obama must rue the day he made the following reported comment in the New York Times after the Gaza ceasefire on November 21:

“Mr. Obama told aides he was impressed with the Egyptian leader’s pragmatic confidence .. He sensed an engineer’s precision with surprisingly little ideology.”

To the contrary – Morsi’s 2010 statements reveal a great deal of ideology concerning the two-state solution and Jews.

Morsi’s scathing and dismissive comments were made on 23 September 2010 (as reported by MEMRI – the Middle East Media Research Institute)

“These futile [Israeli-Palestinian] negotiations are a waste of time and opportunities. The Zionists buy time and gain more opportunities, as the Palestinians, the Arabs, and the Muslims lose time and opportunities, and they get nothing out of it. We can see how this dream has dissipated. This dream has always been an illusion… This [Palestinian] Authority was created by the Zionist and American enemies for the sole purpose of opposing the will of the Palestinian people and its interests.

He added for good measure

“No reasonable person can expect any progress on this track. Either [you accept] the Zionists and everything they want, or else it is war. This is what these occupiers of the land of Palestine know – these blood-suckers, who attack the Palestinians, these warmongers, the descendants of apes and pigs.

This tirade had been preceded by the following statements made by Morsi on Al-Quds TV (Lebanon) March 20, 2010:

“The Zionists have no right to the land of Palestine. There is no place for them on the land of Palestine. What they took before 1947-8 constitutes plundering, and what they are doing now is a continuation of this plundering. By no means do we recognize their Green Line. The land of Palestine belongs to the Palestinians, not to the Zionists.

We must confront this Zionist entity. All ties of all kinds must be severed with this plundering criminal entity, which is supported by America and its weapons, as well as by its own nuclear weapons, the existence of which is well known…

We want a country for the Palestinians on the entire land of Palestine, on the basis of [Palestinian] citizenship. All the talk about a two-state solution and about peace is nothing but an illusion, which the Arabs have been chasing for a long time now. They will not get from the Zionists anything but this illusion.”

The publication of these remarks elicited the following mealy mouthed response from the White House…

“We strongly condemn the remark that then-Muslim Brotherhood leader Morsi made in 2010. The language that we have seen is deeply offensive.  We completely reject these statements, as we do any language that espouses religious hatred. This discourse–this is a broader point–this kind of discourse has been acceptable in the region for far too long and it’s counter to the goal of peace. President Morsi should make clear that he respects people of all faiths, and that this type of rhetoric is not acceptable or productive in a democratic Egypt. Since taking office President Morsi has reaffirmed Egypt’s commitment to its peace treaty with Israel in both word and deed, and has proven willing to work with us towards shared objectives including a ceasefire during the crisis in Gaza last year. These commitments are essential to our bi-lateral relations with Egypt as well as for stability in the region.”

Morsi has so far not obliged the White House.

Why should he? The negotiations have failed – despite offers by Israel in 2000/2001 and 2008.

Morsi’s prescription for curing such failure is a recipe for disaster.

Pursuing a proposal so vigorously opposed by Egypt seems to be the height of stupidity. It cannot and will not eventuate in the face of such opposition.

Unphased by this development – the following statement was made last week following a meeting in Perth of AUKMIN – the Australia-UK Ministerial Consultations attended by Australia’s Foreign Minister Senator Bob Carr, the Australian Minister for Defence – Stephen Smith- and the UK Foreign and Defence Secretaries, William Hague and Philip Hammond.

“The Palestinian Authority and the new Israeli government must engage seriously in negotiations without preconditions. Actions by both sides must be in the interests of peace. Neither side should create obstacles to that objective”

The obstacle to engaging in such negotiations is pretty basic – the PA is dead and buried since it was decreed out of existence by Mahmoud Abbas on 3 January.

Compounding their gaffe the Ministers continued:

” We call on the Palestinian Authority to exercise restraint and avoid provocative actions at international forums.”

The PA has vanished into thin air – no longer able to cause or avoid provocative actions and will no longer be seen at international forums.

This inescapable fact and the revelation of the Morsi statements seem to be of no consequence to these Ministers.

They are in good company with President Obama – whose spokesman Jay Carney had this to say on 23 January:

“We believe that what needs to take place is direct negotiations between the two parties that address the final-status issues and that result in a two-state solution that provides the sovereignty that the Palestinian people deserve and the security that the Israeli people and Israel deserves”

The expectation that Israel could give the Palestinian Arabs what they themselves were never prepared to accept between 1948-1967 – has proved impossible to achieve

The restoration of the status quo that existed at 5 June 1967 – so far as can now occur given the changed circumstances on the ground – remains the last hope.

This will involve negotiations between Israel, Jordan and Egypt to allocate sovereignty in the West Bank and Gaza between their respective States and the abandonment of the two-state solution.

Given Morsi’s extreme views – the time for any negotiations involving Egypt might need to be put on hold – whilst negotiations with Jordan on the return of the major part of the West Bank to its last Arab occupier are attempted.

One thing is certain – a change of course is urgently required – or we will all suffer from the ensuing shipwreck that is staring us in the face.

Flogging a dead horse is not a good idea since the stench emanating from the decomposing body will soon become too overpowering.

David Singer is a Sydney Lawyer and Foundation Member of the International Analysts Network


9 Responses to “Palestine – Morsi Minces Two-State Solution…writes David Singer”
  1. Ben Eleijah says:

    Morsi’s first statement is quite accurate. Negotiations have continued while the expansion of settlements, barrier and exclusive roads have continued to cut the West bank into little open prisons.

    • David says:


      Morsi should be addressing his statements to the PLO as the party that has knocked back so many opportunities and offers of compromise over the past 65 years.

      Remember that what the Palestinian Arabs demand now could have been theirs at any time between1948-1967 when all the Jews had been driven out of the West Bank,Gaza and East Jerusalem. They chose not to make any such demand during those 19 years of Jordanian occupation.

      In 1964 the PLO even said it had no territorial claims in the West Bank. They suddenly changed their tune after 1967.

      Can you demand back what you have voluntarily given away.?

      More than 90% of what they now demand could have been theirs had they not rejected the offers Israel made in 2000 and 2008.

      The longer they display such a rejectionist stance – the more territory is going to disappear from under their grasping noses.

      Indeed now they have disbanded the Palestinian Authority – they probably stand to get nothing.

      That is their perfect entitlement to do so. But it has got them very little.

      If the Arabs want to salvage any part of this territory then It will have to be ultimately divided between Jordan and Israel because this disputed territory is currently no man’s land under the sovereignty of no state – a situation that has existed since 1948..

  2. Leon says:

    We get more educated and fatter and when the anti-semites of the world attack us we defend ourselves by writing letters and inviting Politicians to Coctail Parties,and then we wonder why we are continuously attacked. The press, particularily the Age attack Israel and us because we do nothing to defend ourselves. We need to get rid of the well educated , fat leadership we have in Australia and put into place a group that have a bit of a sharper edge. Enough of letter writing and coctail parties.

  3. Paul Winter says:

    Aaaarrgh!!! Not the “go back to pre-1967 Egyptian/Jordanian territorial control” again. The proposal contradicts the thrust of the article. Since Morsi has not recanted or apologised, his loathsome antisemitism motivates his policies. Having such an implacable enemy in a remilitarised Sinai supporting its offshoot in Gaza is a recipe for war. Similarily a Jordanian monarchy ripe for overthrow by Hamas is no neighbour for Israel. And isn’t it just a tad arrogant to treat the local Arabs as objects to be allocated to the overlordship of Egypt and Jordan, especially after they just received (pretend) statehood? Give that a rest. It ain’t on and is not going to be on. Israel must retain the heights and control of the passes and the Jordan valley. Israel cannot give an inch (or even 2.54 cm) at such a critical time. It must wait, continue to build, prepare for some autonomous Arab enclaves and forcefully encourage the hostile Arabs to emigrate.

    • David says:


      If your scenario eventually happens – as it well could whilst Carr and cronies – Obama ,Hague and the European Union – bury their heads in the sand – I hope not too many crocodile tears are shed at the disappearance of the one solution that could have held out the prospects for a resolution of the conflict between Jews and Arabs – what you term the “go back to pre-1967 Egyptian /Jordanian territorial control”.

      I don’t think it is a tad arrogant to go back to the status quo that existed at 5 June 1967 – so far as is now possible given the changed circumstances on the ground.

      The opportunity for another Arab state between Jordan and Israel existed between 1948-1967 when all the Jews had been driven out of the West Bank, Gaza and East Jerusalem.

      Those halcyon days are not going to return.

      The sooner the West tells the Arabs this reality – the sooner some movement in resolving the conflict is likely to occur.

      Whilst the illegal President of a non-existent State headed by an illegal Prime Minister is treated with rapturous applause and treated with deferential respect wherever he goes – any possibility of a negotiated solution is rapidly disappearing.

  4. Liat Nagar says:

    So much for Obama’s expertise in Middle Eastern affairs. And how depressing, although not surprising, to read Morsi’s vitriolic statements. As for what came out of AUKMIN, not only was the whole thing a waste of money and time, but the resultant statements verge on being boring, with nothing new to say and what is said no longer even appropriate.

  5. Roger says:

    Please send this article to Bob Carr specially ringing in red the last part about the PA being dead and buried. A good long look at reality is needed.

    • David says:


      I don’t have much luck getting responses from Senator Carr and the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade.

      Perhaps he might start to take notice if you and many others sent him a copy of the article and sought his response.

      Let me know if you have any luck.

      Don’t hold your breath waiting for any definitive response.

      • Shirlee says:

        I’ve sent it David, but like you I don’t hope for much. It most likely won’t go further than the office junior who checks the emails.

Speak Your Mind

Comments received without a full name will not be considered
Email addresses are NEVER published! All comments are moderated. J-Wire will publish considered comments by people who provide a real name and email address. Comments that are abusive, rude, defamatory or which contain offensive language will not be published

Leave a Reply to Roger Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.