Negotiator: peace talks failed due to Palestinian demands, Kerry’s approach

March 7, 2017 by Rafael Medoff -
Read on for article

The most recent round of Israeli-Palestinian peace negotiations failed because the Palestinian Authority (PA) responded to each Israeli concession with new demands and the Obama administration kept taking the Palestinians’ side, according to a veteran Israeli negotiator…writes Rafael Medoff/ (ret.) Michael Herzog, a member of Israel’s negotiating teams since 1993, disclosed previously unknown details about the U.S.-Israeli-Palestinian talks that took place in 2013-2014, in an essay for The American Interest Feb. 27.

Israeli protesters hold banners when U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry was in Jerusalem for peace talks March 31, 2014. Credit: Yonatan Sindel/Flash90.

Herzog disputed claims by former State Department envoy Martin Indyk that Israeli housing construction was the main reason the talks failed. “I doubt that even a full settlement freeze would have salvaged these talks,” Herzog wrote. “More compelling causes determined their outcome.”

The major cause for failure, he argued, was that each time Israel offered concessions, Palestinian leaders would respond by demanding more and by taking an extreme step. For example, in hopes of keeping the PA at the negotiating table, Israel at one point offered to give the Palestinians partial control over some sections of Area C, the portion of Judea and Samaria that is under Israeli control. The very next morning, the PA signed a unity pact with the terrorist Hamas regime in Gaza.

On another occasion, Secretary of State John Kerry hoped to convince the PA to extend the negotiations by pressing Israel to release an additional 400 imprisoned terrorists. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu attempted to convince his reluctant cabinet to agree to the demand. Before the cabinet meeting had even concluded, the PA announced it was asking 15 international agencies for recognition as the “state of Palestine”—violating the conditions Kerry set for the talks.

These Palestinian actions “shattered our nascent hopes” for a peace agreement, Herzog wrote. They confirmed “the Palestinian mindset I have witnessed for years. It is as if negotiations are simply about exacting what Palestinians perceive to be their rights, rather than engaging in a two-way give-and-take.”

The situation was further complicated by the fact that Kerry sometimes presented the PA with concessions by Israel that were more extensive than what the Israelis were actually offering. “Our jaws dropped” when they learned what Kerry had been offering the Palestinians, Herzog wrote.

In one instance, PA President Mahmoud Abbas demanded that Israeli Arabs be included among the terrorists who were going to be released. “The Israelis were unwilling to bargain over its own citizens convicted under its own laws, and conveyed this position to the U.S. side early on,” Herzog reported. “They were soon surprised to find out that Kerry had nonetheless promised this to Abbas, later claiming a misunderstanding with Israel.”

There was a similar “misunderstanding” when Abbas demanded the terrorists be permitted to return to the territories. “The head of Israel’s General Security Services, Yoram Cohen, warned all along that some of these prisoners were still dangerous and would likely go back to murdering Israelis if released to their homes in the West Bank,” and this was “conveyed to the U.S. side early on,” according to Herzog. Kerry nevertheless assured Abbas “that all prisoners would be released ‘to their homes,’” and when the Israelis protested, Kerry’s aides said the diplomat “was not aware of this nuance,” he wrote.

“U.S. negotiators put great pressure on the Israeli side to feed the extension of negotiations with gestures,” Herzog recalled. “It soon felt like a bazaar, with the Palestinians adding more and more to their cart of insatiable demands.” Even after Kerry agreed to Israeli construction inside existing Jewish communities that were within the major settlement blocs, he wrote, “the U.S. side complained” about the construction and “Kerry began to press for significant restraint in the future.”

For Alan Baker, a former Israeli diplomat who directs the Institute for Contemporary Affairs at the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, the Herzog revelations illustrate Kerry’s bias against Israel. Baker, who served as Israel’s ambassador to Canada, told he is “not at all” surprised to learn that Kerry misled the Israeli negotiators, because “Kerry, despite his false claims of friendship and sympathy [toward Israel], consistently displayed ignorance, utter naiveté, and even hostility.”

President Barack Obama made one last attempt to convince the PA to continue negotiating. At a White House meeting March 17, 2014, Herzog wrote that Abbas “was presented with new ideas and formulations that departed from traditional official U.S. positions and tilted toward his positions and that were never shared with Israel.” One of the ideas involved turning the Old City of Jerusalem and adjoining neighbourhoods into the capital of “Palestine.” Abbas never responded, and “to this day, he has not provided a response,” Herzog concluded.

David Bukay, a professor of Middle East Studies at the University of Haifa, told that Herzog’s account demonstrates how the fundamental problem in the negotiations was the Obama administration’s failure to understand that the PA’s goal is ultimately to conquer Israel “in its entirety.” That, he said, “is why all the mediators and schemes have failed in finding a solution to the Arab-Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and why we are still at square one.”

Raphael Israeli, an emeritus professor of Middle Eastern history at Hebrew University, said the tactics used by the PA in the 2013-2014 negotiations show that the Palestinian leadership will accept only “peace on their terms,” which ultimately can involve only “a de-Zionised, de-Judaised Israel, never a Jewish state.”


2 Responses to “Negotiator: peace talks failed due to Palestinian demands, Kerry’s approach”
  1. Howard A. Levin says:

    It is not only the Palestinians who are not interested in a real peace with Israel but Obama and Kerry colluded with the Palestinians to intentionally harm the Jewish State. Obama and Kerry claimed to care about Israel but even at the end of the Obama administration, he intentionally set up a plan to refuse to veto a resolution about the settlements, thus harming Israel. In addition, in the last hours of the Obama administration, he intentionally tried to send over $200 million in aid to the Palestinians hoping that no one would be able to intervene. Martin Indyk is of the same ilk. Do these sound like friends of Israel? I don’t think so. Thank G-d President Trump is now the President of the U.S. and appears to have a much kinder appreciation for the Jewish State. The Palestinians were coddled by the Obama administration because that’s where Obama’s and Kerry’s preferences lie. I doubt that Mr. Herzog is a hawk and yet even he confirms the conclusions I’m making.

  2. Marta Mikey Frid says:

    It’s time to stop saying things we all know and get to the roots of it.
    The Palestinians cannot afford to negotiate a peace agreement because:
    1. Their leaders know they will lose an irreplaceable source of income from all their self-interested sympathizers, and
    2. Any Palestinian leader who will dare offer such a step toward peace, would be the first candidate for the highest celebrated lynching from all those they have been indoctrinating since the days of the partition
    Until such time as we confront the motives for the corrupt Palestinian leadership and all those international powers that keep on feeding them, both the Israelis and the Palestinian people will keep on suffering nothing but ceaseless killing.

Speak Your Mind

Comments received without a full name will not be considered
Email addresses are NEVER published! All comments are moderated. J-Wire will publish considered comments by people who provide a real name and email address. Comments that are abusive, rude, defamatory or which contain offensive language will not be published

Leave a Reply to Marta Mikey Frid Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.