Comments on: London Beth Din’s Mizrachi/Gutnick decision

By: mizrachi

mizrachi — Wed, 26 Aug 2009 11:07:34 +0000

And yet you continue to post your worthless immature comments.

Are you proud that you can cowardly defame people on the internet???

You were wasting your time long before you directed petty remarks in my direction.

Your cynicism and slander won’t get you anywhere in life.

Shame on you!!!

By: typical

typical — Wed, 26 Aug 2009 08:09:22 +0000

mizrachi

you have been outed. i now know who you are. sorry for even engaging you in comment or conversation. (what a waste of time – eyeball roll). i am truly wasting my time engaging you in comment or conversation (its like talking to wall) an irellevant wall at that

typical

By: typical

typical — Wed, 26 Aug 2009 05:50:43 +0000

mizrachi … what about these words of mine

mizrachi now has costs to pay
shule still cant get a normal minyan going …….
members are fighting
community is laughing stock

clearly everyone is a loser in this sorry story …… oh and mizrachi grow up …….. your whinging sounds like my kids

By: MIzrachi

MIzrachi — Wed, 26 Aug 2009 01:26:16 +0000

To “typical”:

Your comments trully are “directed to both parties”

“especially the greedy rabbis always fighting for money and kovod”
“rabbi looks like a bozo ”
“perhaps he can go to blackman”

With such attitudes you will go far in life.

By: typical

typical — Tue, 25 Aug 2009 23:29:29 +0000

mizrachi

i am not a baord member at mizrachi …. the last time i davened there was 3-4 years ago for a rare simcha in the shule … not that you could tell.

i stay (live and daven) far away from the place.

my comments were directed to both parties ie rabbi … who i dont feel sorry for at all really could not care less about and board who i dont care about either. i thought i was clear saying they are both losers in this whole affair.

mizrachi …. loose the chip on your shoulder

By: MIzrachi

MIzrachi — Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:33:18 +0000

To the “typical” board member,

You can use whatever pseudonymn you want for your slander campaign.

You still remain a coward.

Your vicious attack on Rabbis is synonymous with your actions over the last 10 months.

The only “bozo” in this situation is a board who refused Rabbi Gutnick’s offer of a $500,000 settlement (much less than what we now know he is legally and halachically owed).

And is now left with a debt until 2024.

The rabbi doesn’t need your sympathy.

How ironic!

By: typical

typical — Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:59:28 +0000

typical typical sydney – everyone especially the greedy rabbis always fighting for money and kovod. cant you see the irony ……

no one has won …… mizrachi now has costs to pay ….. rabbi looks like a bozo …… shule still cant get a normal minyan going ……. members are fighting ….. rabbi no has no local place to daven (perhaps he can go to blackman …. speaking of irony that WOULD BE IRONIC) ……. community is laughing stock

i guess well all know better for next time (thats what we all said last time ….lawrence etc)

typical sydney no one will ever learn

By: Non Member “ Observer “

Non Member “ Observer “ — Tue, 25 Aug 2009 04:45:24 +0000

It is clear like day & night – that Board had one agenda to get rid of Rabbi – no matter what the cost is .
Congratulation you succeeded , I guess everyone is happy now – Rabbi got money , – The Shoul got rid of Gudntik , – Lawyers & Barrister got paid . Now shoul members will have to dig in their pockets to pay for it all .
It may come is a news to some Mezrachi members , but during the dispute – The Mezrachi board has been offered a merger with Chabad House .
“ The offered consisted of:
1. paying Rabbi Gudntik claim
2. injecting additional $500, 000.00 in to the shouls account for renovation
3. additional $1 000,000.00 over 10 years for maintain & activities
Condition:
Appointment of New Rabbi , ( no wages needed )
The Shoul membership will accept new members to its Board .”
Well some people wish to have power & control , but at what cost ? – & who is going to pay for it ?

By: Non Member “ Observer “

Non Member “ Observer “ — Tue, 25 Aug 2009 03:13:31 +0000

I am confused, who won the case ?
I think a Rabbi has won .
The London Berth Din has recognise , that Mezrahi has to pay Rabbi Gudnik a pay out .
Now Mezrahi is without a Rabbi, & still has to pay his wages .
So you got read of the Rav at the cost of $800.000.00 Plus your legal cost so it cost Mezrahi around $1 000.000.00 . Where is the Hohma ?
He was willing to except $500.000.00 before the Berth Din . Now it cost Mezrahi double that .
“Very Smart” negotiators .

By: MIzrachi

MIzrachi — Mon, 24 Aug 2009 22:53:56 +0000

Of course this is your last post.

You have been proven wrong again and again.

You simply havent the wherewithal to defend this immoral and irresponsible board.

Lies about the rabbi and his family were neve going to get you anywhere with people who already know the truth.

Good riddance.