<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: From the embassy to an undivided Jerusalem	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.jwire.com.au/from-the-embassy-to-an-undivided-jerusalem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.jwire.com.au/from-the-embassy-to-an-undivided-jerusalem/</link>
	<description>Australia, NZ and worldwide Jewish news that matters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2018 08:18:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Erica Edelman		</title>
		<link>https://www.jwire.com.au/from-the-embassy-to-an-undivided-jerusalem/#comment-295406</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Erica Edelman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2018 08:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jwire.com.au/?p=82910#comment-295406</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[None-the-less by not tearing the city apart the 
Problem still remains. What belongs to whom in the (un) likelihood  of a two state solution?
Like in the hills of Judea and Samaria the “old 
Green lines” are being fused, confused, and re-delineated  and redefined as new settlers pour into what’s now a mish-mush of suburban growth- the original paradigm of areas A, B and C is being compromised - to state the obvious.
Is this a good thing or a bad thing ..or a no-thing? To my mind it makes the whole idea of a two state solution extremely difficult now and into the future.
Are we going to see houses sliced into two with security walls down the middle?
Houston ! We have a problem! Israeli settlement growth is a wonderful thing but at what cost to the drawing up of new boundary
Lines?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>None-the-less by not tearing the city apart the<br />
Problem still remains. What belongs to whom in the (un) likelihood  of a two state solution?<br />
Like in the hills of Judea and Samaria the “old<br />
Green lines” are being fused, confused, and re-delineated  and redefined as new settlers pour into what’s now a mish-mush of suburban growth- the original paradigm of areas A, B and C is being compromised &#8211; to state the obvious.<br />
Is this a good thing or a bad thing ..or a no-thing? To my mind it makes the whole idea of a two state solution extremely difficult now and into the future.<br />
Are we going to see houses sliced into two with security walls down the middle?<br />
Houston ! We have a problem! Israeli settlement growth is a wonderful thing but at what cost to the drawing up of new boundary<br />
Lines?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: www.jwire.com.au @ 2026-06-15 16:36:36 by W3 Total Cache
-->