By: Otto Waldmann

Otto Waldmann — Thu, 27 Feb 2014 21:26:58 +0000

Not quite sure about the term “slammed” in what “naughty boy” Misha Danby (sic) has done by desecrating the House through the use of explosive sarcasm.
Calling Howard a “socialist” while wagging one’s tongue in the proximity of the rosy cheeks, does not look to me as the rhetorical powder keg.
Incidentally, the Andrew Bolt case demonstrated that the law, as it stands, DID work, it was/is ethically proven valid and necessary. The complaints against Bolt were NOT dismissed as “trivial” or “vexatious”, in legal terms governing the very act 18C, Bolt was considered apt for Court hearing and found guilty. So the Bolt reason should be used as the best example of a necessary law.
The reasons behind the manipulated attempt at repealing 18C, could be found in the perception of a monocultural political elite ( the governing one !!) that smaller and veciferous minute interest gropus are interfering with the very governance of the political entities “meant”, actually electorally appointed, to run the country. Here one may even speculate that “certain” apex principles of “entitlement” by those hyper-active small groups, may contravene what is preffered as the local, Australian traditional model. Allowing for the inevitable progress in social behaviour, 18C may be seen as endowing peripheral, centrifugal ideologies ( the same small groups ) to gain unwanted prevalence. It is not without a reason why only CERTAIN ethnic groups are seen at the forefront of the defence of 18C, Jewish “interests’ included. We do NOT see larger ethnic groups intersted, such as Greek or Italian !!! Let’s speculate: Italians are also part of the larger Catholic and also of older residence and well integrated. Same with the Greek community, intergrated, not closely associated with other ethnic groups, individually self-sufficient. Anti “wag”/Italian/Greek attitudes have been replaced in society’s “school-yard” by anti Asian, Middle Eastern sentiments.
Why is, then , the Jew involved !!! It is a given; antisemitism is, by far, the most popular form of inter-cultural entertainment. Anti-Asian sentiments do not carry the same juicy ( Jewcy !!!) substance. The Jew is prctically universally interchangeable in any derogatory situation from the trivial, vexatious to the serioulsy prejudiced.
In a way, not so far fetched, the attempt by Tim Wilson and the mob behind him to repeal 18C is a move to clear the way to PREJUDICE as a valid and, definitely, POTENT clearing agent of minds, otherwise clogged with the annoying interference of those small intersts group morality into the core Australian true-blue 24/7 pastime of ESTABLISH(ed)(ment) dominance against the sizeable, visible invasion of the “foreign” element, as legal as the “invasion” has been and continues to be. It is a statement of desire of the dominant political group of retention of monoculturalism, in spite of a country which has deemed it necessary to INCLUDE other cultures in its structure as a vital, survival socio-econnomical method. We are dealing with the division based on absurd prejudice of the political/cultural from the socio-economical imperatives.
Tim Wilson is clever enough to understand all that, but he, in his own cynical/happy way, prefers to ignore these impeding facts. Why !!?? Only he – AND WE – know.

Comments on: Danby defends Section 18C

By: Otto Waldmann