Is “Part II, Section 9 ” of the “Racial Duscrimination Act good enough to warrant complaints and or legal action on account of the merrits of the proposed “weaker” Section III, Part 18c ??!!

If Section 18c, as suggested, would allow the current prohibitions, can, an “offended” party retort in the same manner ??!!
What I am saying with the type of personal confidence which would mittigate that I personally would know how to “handle” any objectionable behaviour, is that if “someone’ would have a go at me in the prejudicial way ,now somehow prohibited, I would tell that person/institution what I think of them in no uncertain terms. It means that I feel that I have sufficient trust in my identity and the manner in which I can defend it. Furthermor, a more open dialectical platform would give me the fair chance of demonstarting how right I am and how incredibly wrong the bastards attacking me are. I would use, as ususal, the type of TRUTH which “normally” offends.
I can do it, what about yourse, tough guys CEO, Directors, Presidents etc. !!??