‘Believe more in the threats of our enemies than in the promises of our allies’

March 16, 2022 by Ron Weiser
Read on for article

Some years ago, I heard the head of an Israeli think tank say, that Jewish life is a constant tension between two, often clashing, narratives.

Ron Weiser

The continuity of Jewish values – and the value of Jewish continuity.

This construct left a deep impression and has stayed with me ever since. It encapsulates in a beautiful way, the somewhat schizophrenic existence of the Jewish People.

The tension between these two complex values is also apparent and applicable to many aspects of Israel’s existence.

There is no doubt in almost anyone’s mind that in Ukraine’s brave defence of her sovereignty, she holds the moral high ground.

Whilst this translates into backing from many countries, led by Western democracies, their support is limited to statements of solidarity, sanctions and supplies.

Very much weakening their response, is that these elements are also accompanied by public statements, with no room for even some ambiguity, that no one will commit troops to aid in Ukraine’s defence.

Whether Putin expected the sanctions to be as tough as they are or not, one thing he relied on, was that the world would leave the Ukrainian people to do the actual fighting with Russia by themselves. Alone.

Israel, one should keep in mind, is a very small country, with less than one quarter the population of Ukraine and one twenty-eighth its landmass. For Israel, strategic depth is just non-existent. It’s meaningless.

There are clear lessons for Israel here.

Israel needs to be able to defend herself – and in a short space of time. No one else will.

Against the background of the war in Ukraine bringing daily news of increasing horror, the new Chancellor of Germany visited Israel.

It has to be said that Chancellor Scholz has surprised most people by showing a far more assertive stance from Germany towards the Russians than under his predecessor Merkel, but again, only to a point.

Scholz said: “We’re seriously concerned about how this conflict is going to develop. Of course, the issue now is that diplomacy gets another big chance.”

Well. Yes. But. The first and immediate issue is to stop Russia from massacring Ukrainians – and what to do till diplomacy may kick in.

President Zelensky has pleaded with the world to, at a minimum, ensure a ‘no-fly zone’ over Ukraine.

Former Ukrainian Prime Minister Volodymyr Groysman (who is also Jewish) backed Zelensky’s call for a no-fly zone saying “Your blankets will not protect Ukrainians from missile and bomb attack”.

Zelensky said: “If we fall you fall”, warning Europe, he says, that if Putin was not stopped in Ukraine, other parts of Europe would soon be fighting the war between authoritarianism and democracy on their own territory.

Ukrainian Defence Minister Oleksii Reznikov said: “Ukrainian children and women are saving your children and women at the cost of their own lives as you hesitate to close the sky.”

The world, however, is not prepared to risk widening the war by potentially engaging with Russia directly.

Putin’s multiple threats are both scaring and working on the West.

What Ukrainian price is Western diplomacy willing to tolerate or ‘allow’ the Ukrainians to pay? And for how long?

So far, we do not know, but Putin will not turn to diplomacy till he can either claim he has achieved his aims or is forced to cease and desist.

Chancellor Scholz’s trip to Israel brought with it a deepening of the security arrangements between Germany and Israel and a strong statement when Scholz reaffirmed Germany’s commitment to Israel’s security saying: “You can rely on it. Germany will continue to be steadfast at Israel’s side.”

Wonderful. No one doubts his sincerity.

Just his judgement. And it’s practical worth.

Because, whilst still in Israel, Scholz also said, in regards to the proposed JCPOA deal with Iran: “Now is the time to make a decision. This must not be postponed any longer and cannot be postponed any longer. Now is the time to finally say yes to something that represents a good and reasonable solution.”

If Scholz believes that what is being put forward with Iran is both “good and reasonable”, one wonders just how he reconciles this with being “steadfast at Israel’s side”.

Moreover, if Germany thinks that Iran can be trusted to keep any deal…….well that is Western naiveté at its most obvious.

Which highlights lesson number two – the limitations of stand-alone diplomacy and so-called deals with despotic regimes.

Ex-Israeli ambassador to the UN, Danny Danon, says that during one of his last meetings with Nobel Prize laureate Eli Wiesel, Wiesel said to him: “Promise me Danny that you will always believe more in the threats of our enemies than in the promises of our allies.”

The lesson that Israel already knew, but that her allies and some Jews need to learn, is that the threats of Israel’s enemies are real and these threats are uttered by countries and terrorist organisations who operate with a different world mindset, than well intentioned allies who live in some state of wishful hopefulness.

Diplomacy alone, is ineffective against countries like Iran, led by unbending leaders following a fanatical ideology, publicly promising to eliminate Israel. Something that Western eyes seem blind to.

Israel is walking a tightrope, between condemning the war in Ukraine, and not harming relations with Russia.

Perhaps some parallels exist in regards to Jewish decision making during WW2. Not in direct comparison to the current circumstances, but in how minorities in particular, have to weigh multiple interests.

During WW2, Ben Gurion was trying to devise a way forward. The British were both fighting the Nazis and yet simultaneously implementing the White Paper, dramatically restricting Jewish immigration to the Mandate. Jews who were trying to flee for their lives, from the very same Nazis.

Ben Gurion determined that: “We will fight the war as if there were no White Paper, and we will fight the White Paper as if there were no war.”

Amongst the many factors to consider in how and to what extent to support Ukraine, here are just two that Israel lives with.

There are significant Jewish populations both in Russia and in Ukraine.

Historically the ether in both countries has been replete with antisemitism. One saving grace is that this time, however, many Israeli commentators are noting that neither side is playing the antisemitic card.

This of course, even in spite of the fact that the heroic and somewhat Churchillian President Zelensky, is openly Jewish.

So, aside from Israel’s responsibility to her citizens, she needs to be very careful to not further endanger the position of either Russian or Ukrainian Jewry.

Another very serious concern is the Russian role in Syria.

With Presidents Obama, Trump and Biden, all following the same policy of American withdrawal from the Middle East, Putin’s Russia stepped into the vacuum they left, effectively taking control over Syria.

Putin, with a series of understandings and arrangements that date back to Netanyahu’s time in office, has allowed Israel to operate over and in Syria. Specifically to stop Iranian to Hezbollah weapons transfers and other Iranian activities. For Israel it is vital that these actions be allowed to continue.

Many voices are coming out of Israel, but as Prime Minister, Bennett’s is the most critical. However, his stance, particularly on sanctions and refugee numbers, is not playing well with many Israelis, nor as well as he had hoped with President Zelensky and to some degree, America.

His mediation/facilitation role may go either way. It depends on perception and outcome.

And this is against the background of a world where Israel’s allies back Ukraine with sanctions on Russia, whilst simultaneously and ironically, lifting them on Iran.

Israel is in the precarious situation of trying to be on the ‘right side of history’, but without being consigned to its dustbin.

How Israel threads the needle between the consideration of both, the continuity of Jewish values and the value of Jewish continuity frames the complex challenges of today.

Not for the first time – nor for the last.

Ron Weiser is the Honorary Life Member ZFA Executive and Honorary Life President, State Zionist Council of NSW

Comments

One Response to “‘Believe more in the threats of our enemies than in the promises of our allies’”
  1. Liat Kirby says:

    Excellent discussion on what is a fraught and complicated issue. What makes it so hard, of course, is the blatant and relentless inhumanity displayed by Putin on a daily basis.

    Is this the kind of man we can even begin to think of dealing with in the future in regard to Syria? How that pans out, it seems, could be up for grabs at any time. Perhaps we are already living on borrowed time. You can never appease bullies and autocrats.

    It’s to be hoped Putin personally will be toppled, and by his own.

Speak Your Mind

Comments received without a full name will not be considered
Email addresses are NEVER published! All comments are moderated. J-Wire will publish considered comments by people who provide a real name and email address. Comments that are abusive, rude, defamatory or which contain offensive language will not be published

Leave a Reply to Liat Kirby Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.