Julie Nathan uses the term”obvious” and all I want to see is tha famous OBVIOUS !!!
Ignorance is perpetuated when the “obvious” is not quite obviated.
In the meantime Paul Winter KNOWS what he is talking about, i.e. NOTHING obvious emerging from ECAJ and Julie, together with efusive Shirlee, who also happens to be on the side of defending the obvious gurnischt, should ponder their unjustified excitement for the imperious fac tottum ECAJ and search for the misterious evidence.
Just in case the public domain is another unresolved mistery, if ECAJ and the rest of our leadership would have the slightest idea how to handle the public domain , we would be fortunate enought to see and hear them in the public domain putting forward our cases with such aplomb in persuasion that all those targeted , read enemies of Zionut, would be left bereft of retort.

SHOW ME THE PERSON IN OUR COMMUNITY CAPABLE OF THAT !!!!!! FOR I KNOW OF NO ONE !!!!!

“Obviously” Julie has no idea how these matters must be addressed !
If ECAJ is, indeed, doing something and not sitting on their hands as Shirlee asumes with such firm knowledge of NOTHING, as she admits, these are matters that are best treated if , INDEED, are brought out in the open !!!
But, hey, could that, indeed – again-, be consistent with a communal leadership that is “best” functioning behind the scenes, along the coridors of power – read farcical shows of “consideration” – by those incredibly able diplomats of our communal intersts, those brilliant political minds who have achieved all those things which are best kept as secrets, under the same logic as what…obviously Julie protects as the best strategy.
Keep it stumm and we all will then assume that we are guarded by the most infallible team of te best possible leadership….

Do you want me to expand on the merrits of open policy campaigning and the value of obviating the …obvious in such a manner that your argument is, indeed – for the last time – seen as utterly persuasive ?! ECAJ has done bugger all because there no evidence of it, except for the ” assurances” generously offered by Julie Nathan – and that should be evidence enough…….( sound effects of healthy laughter )
If so smart, convince me that you – both ladies – can put forward an argument of open promotion of REAL Jewish, Zionist values, unaffraid of the “consequances”. This is how Eretz Israel is being protected to the extent that even the “secret” services publicise thei exploits as the best mode of allerting all those inclined to cause harm that ” we do exist and live “.
Communal policies are not some secret society cum confidential exchanges of tit bits. That would be best left for WIZO – endless – happy hours little “dos”.

( Now I got meself some new admirers !!! )

Paul

How can you condemn something you have no knowledge of ?.

I have none either on this issue, so I wouldn’t presume to pass comment, especially a negative one.

I would suggest you do likewise, as you’re likely to be the one with egg on his face.

You can rest assured that the ECAJ is not sitting on the sidelines twiddling its thumbs. That much I do know.

There are those who make things happen, there are those who watch things happen and there are those who wonder about what is happening. No prize for guessing into which category the ECAJ falls into.