Comments on: ALP resolution: AIJAC has its say

By: Eleonora Mostert

Eleonora Mostert — Thu, 13 Aug 2015 10:59:21 +0000

Personally I’m sick to death of every nation interfering with Israel’s right to rule themselves. Yet the world interferes continuously and makes the situation worse.They don’t listen or read the facts. As for the Labor Party and the Greens they’re bigots, hypocrites of the worst kind. No one in their right mind would or should trust their leader.

By: Eion Isaac Israel

Eion Isaac Israel — Tue, 28 Jul 2015 00:36:20 +0000

A land swap is agreed to even if the Conference regards the settlements as illegal.In fact the Settlements with 500,000 Jews reveal there was enough room for all the Jews of eEurope to have had refugee in British Mandated Palestine and that the Genocide of six million Jews could have been
Prevented .A Jewish Arab confederation on Socialist Principles with Human Rights and Democracy the Socialist Confederation established iver time .But no Islam took
a Fascistic Line of Jewish Minority in the Dhimmi Apartheid .
Therefore the Jews deserve full compensation for their Losses Political Territorial and Economic .
Inter nationalistic Humanism demands equal rights for all Palestinian Arabs who have the capacity to live in peace with their Jewish neighbours .
The Jews being the Minority in the area have to have Security behind defensible borders .

By: Otto Waldmann

Otto Waldmann — Mon, 27 Jul 2015 07:30:59 +0000

There is a strong – actually unbearable – whiff of ALP loyalty ahead of genuine Jewish commitments in the AIJAC analysis. It is as if a certain Ms Wendy Turner never took the floor, flooring thus a realistic, balanced stance a major Australian political party was expected to display. While the “Turner line” has not been adopted entirely, ALP is still showing strong emotional affection for the palestinian cause well ahead of what us, Zionists would have liked.
My only consolation is that ALP’s electoral fortunes are far from being rosy, in spite of some( completely irrational ) optimistic comments, considering a rebound of its leader’s chances.

Same comment as on AIJAC goes 100% for ECAJ.
These guys are not even crypto-Labor men, anyway…

By: Leon Poddebsky

Leon Poddebsky — Sun, 26 Jul 2015 12:45:58 +0000

Among the sins of the ALP is their fraudulent misrepresentation of Yitzhak Rabin, who declared in the Knesset on 5 October 1995 that Israel will not return to the 4 June 1967 lines; that most of the territory of the British Mandate would remain part of the State of Israel and that the Palestinian Arab political entity would be “less than a state.” [sic]

The ALP’s lust for a third Palestinian state [additional to Gaza and Jordan] is driven by their conviction that such a militarised state would, like Hamastan in Gaza, constitute yet another weapon in the Arab struggle for the phased extinction of Jewish national self-determination.

For any ALP member to invoke Yitzhak Rabin is an affront to the latter’s memory.