Comments on: A difference of interpretation

By: David Eisenberg

David Eisenberg — Mon, 28 Jun 2021 22:21:13 +0000

Once again the ABC is in denial about its journalists biased interpretation of events.
It looks like our relatively small community is on its own.
All the more reason to continue strong support of Israel as our one and only secure lifeline

By: Marika Biber

Marika Biber — Mon, 28 Jun 2021 10:58:25 +0000

Could it be that the ABC’s Managing Director did not wish it to be made public that “……….David Anderson readily acknowledged that the Q + A program and the ABC’s news and current affairs coverage of the conflict had contained “many errors” for which he apologised. ……….” Did he apologise? did he agree that there were errors? does he also think that the ABC is biased and creates a division which leads to hostility and hatred between communities? After all, there are over 600.000 Muslims in Australia and the numbers have it! ABC needs to be defunded! All these talks are niceties which are made to look as if someone is doing…………what?

By: DAVID SINGER

DAVID SINGER — Mon, 28 Jun 2021 06:26:02 +0000

How can the ECAJ and the ABC have such different takes on their meeting?

The ABC claim that “The ABC’s position has been misrepresented by a statement issued today by the Executive Council of Australian Jewry” is a very serious unsubstantiated charge to make by the national broadcaster against the ECAJ leadership. The ABC needs to justify this derogatory statement with facts.

An ECAJ detailed response setting out the specific complaints it made and the ABC’s response to those complaints is now urgently required.