Reflections on the murders in Paris

January 15, 2015 by Jonathan Spyer
Read on for article

The Islamic world is currently in the midst of a great historic convulsion…writes Jonathan Spyer.This process is giving birth to political trends and movements of a murderously violent nature. These movements offer a supposed escape route from the humiliation felt at the profound societal failure of the Arab and to a slightly lesser extent the broader Muslim world.

Jonathan Spyer speaks in Australia        Photo: Henry Benjamin

Jonathan Spyer speaks in Australia Photo: Henry Benjamin

The escape is by way of the most violent and intolerant historic trends of Islam, into a mythologized and imagined past. The route to this old-new imagined utopia is a bloody one. All who oppose or even slight it must die. The simple and brutal laws of 7th century Muslim Arabia are re-applied, in their literal sense. The events of last week in Paris were a manifestation of this trend.

These trends exist not only in the Arab and Muslim worlds themselves. Because of mass immigration from the Arab and Muslim world to western European countries, they are also powerful and present in immigrant communities in these countries. The Kouachi brothers and Amedi Coulibaly are the latest, and no doubt not the last representatives of this political world to impose themselves on us.

The political trend in question is called political Islam. It manifests itself in its most extreme form in the rival global networks of the Al Qaeda movement and the Islamic State. But these, alas, are only the sharp tip of a much larger iceberg.

Political Islam and its followers are not all, or mainly, young men from slums.
On the contrary, its adherents include heads of state, powerful economic interests and media groups, and prominent cultural figures. Some of these, absurdly, were even present at the “solidarity rally” in Paris.

They rendered this event an empty spectacle by their presence.

Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu of Turkey, for example, came to offer his solidarity to the victims of journalists murdered by Islamists in Paris, just two days after the Turkish courts sentenced a pianist to a 10 month prison sentence, suspended for five years, for the crime of “denigrating religion (ie Islam).”

More urgently, Turkey has been an active supporter of both Islamic State and al-Qaeda forces in northern Syria over the last three years. That is, Davutoglu was marching in condemnation of forces to which his own government has offered support.

Political Islam is a reaction to profound societal failure. It is also a flight into unreality. It has nothing practical to offer as an actual remedy to Arab and Islamic developmental problems. Economic, legal and societal models deriving from the 7th century Arabian desert are fairly obvious impediments to success in the 21st.

Where they are systematically imposed, as in the Islamic State, they will create something close to hell on earth. Where they remain present in more partial forms — as in Qatar, Gaza, Iran, (increasingly) Turkey, and so on — they will merely produce stifling, stagnant and repressive societies.

But the remedy for failure that political Islam offers is not a material one. It offers in generous portions the intoxicating psychological cocktail of murderous rage and self-assertion, and the desire to strike out and destroy those deemed enemies — infidels who transgress binding religious commandments, Jews and so on.

This is not the first time that Europe has encountered political phenomena based on murderous rage and utopias buried in the magical past. The European fascist movements produced precisely such a mix. But of course, this time around, the rage and the utopia derive not from European culture, but from an alien culture which has implanted itself among the Europeans.

Here is the second part of the problem. Arab and Muslim societies may be failures and basket cases, but they retain an exceptionally strong and vivid sense of themselves. It is the irony of history that this sense of self is precisely of a type that is bound to keep their societies mired in failure. But history favors irony, and this sense nevertheless remains powerfully experienced and hence politically potent. In this respect, the modern Islamic world resembles western Europe of 80 or 90 years ago, but not the contemporary continent.

In contemporary western European societies, political Islam meets a human collectivity suffering, by contrast, from a profound loss of self. No one, at least in the mainstream of politics and culture, seems able to quite articulate what western European countries are for, or what they oppose — at least beyond a sort of vapid belief in everyone doing what they want and not bothering each other.

The result is that when violent political Islam collides with the satiated, lost societies of western Europe, the response is not defiance on the part of the latter, but rather fear.
This fear, as fear is wont to do, manifests itself in various, not particularly edifying, ways.
The most obvious is avoidance (“the attacks had nothing to do with Islam,” “unemployment and poverty are the root cause,” “the Islamic State is neither Islamic nor a state,” etc etc).

Another is appeasement — “maybe if we give them some of what they want, they’ll leave us alone.”
This response perhaps partially explains the notable adoption in parts of western Europe of the anti-Jewish prejudice so prevalent in the Islamic world.

The ennui of the western European mainstream will almost certainly prevent the adoption of the very tough measures which alone might serve to adequately address the burgeoning problem of large numbers of young European Muslims committed to political Islam and to violence against their host societies.

Such measures — which would include tighter surveillance and policing of communities, quick deportations of incendiary preachers, revocation of citizenship for those engaged in violence, possible imprisonment of suspects and so on — would require a political will which is manifestly absent. So it wont happen. So the events of Paris will almost certainly recur.

And lastly, since the elites will not be able to produce resistance, it will come from outside of the elites. Hence the growth of populist, nationalist parties and movements in western Europe. But Europe being what it is, such revivalist movements are likely to contain a hefty dose of the xenophobia and bigotry which characterized the continent of old.

None of this can, at present, be discussed in polite European society. But all of it is fairly obvious. For this reason, Europe’s Jews are at present warily eying the door. As someone who was born in western Europe, and left it 25 years ago for Israel, I am happy to conclude that as a result of the efforts and sacrifice of many, Europe’s Jews are this time around neither defenseless nor alone. Nor will their blood be free to be taken with impunity.

Dr. Jonathan Spyer is a senior research fellow at the Global Research in International Affairs Center in Herzliya, Israel, and a fellow at the Middle East Forum. He is the author of The Transforming Fire: The Rise of the Israel-Islamist Conflict (Continuum, 2010) and a columnist at the Jerusalem Post newspaper. Spyer holds a PhD in International Relations from the London School of Economics and a Masters’ Degree in Middle East Politics from the School of Oriental and African Studies in London.

This article was first published by the Gloria Center – Global Research in International Affairs…http://www.gloria-center.org/2015/01/reflections-on-the-murders-in-paris/.

Comments

3 Responses to “Reflections on the murders in Paris”
  1. harry rich says:

    I suggest that Otto Waldman should read – carefully – the most excellent analysis by professor Clive Kessler about the origin of the “rage” which is the impetus for barbaric behavior by the large and growing numbers of Islamic terrorists and the contents of sermons by many Muslim clerics.
    Mr. Waldmann should also listen to the speech by Generall Sissi of Egypt where he talks of the need for a “Religious Revolution” within Islam at the present time to prevent future catastrophic consequences.

    • Otto Waldmann says:

      Mr. Rich, Mr. Waldmann has read and also answered Clive Kessler’s opinion and Pres. Sisi’s initiatives are incredibly well harmonised with mine.

      ow

  2. Otto Waldmann says:

    Rarely have I encountered a more ridiculous pseudo intellectual self indulgent editorial hogwash, particularly in a Jewish medium.
    Notions such as Islamic religious movements emerged as a reaction to the failure of Arab states…
    Islam has never “exited” Arab states, quite the opposite is true. The “failure” of alternative societies were not the result of “failures” of the alternatives, but a result of incessant conflict between the transformations required by a modernised minority with the existing MILLENARIAN islamic mores, political structures.
    Post-colonial Arab lands have been re-fashioned into political entities in a quasi artificial manner, from atop a westernised bourgeoisie, in all cases planted with outside, former colonial support.
    Traditional religious elite was, at once oppressed and conditioned to resist in its MORE effective way, by simply continue to exist and, of course, preach.
    Fundamental islam and that includes ALL current paramilitary islmic extreme forms, never left the places now we discover them. ALL islamic countries are the NATURAL, organic environment for ANY form of islam, no matter how extreme we consider it. Post Ataturk Turkey is reversing to pre-Ataturk and it seems to do it seamlessly. Te only country where the phenomenon of “non-reversal” trend is Indonesia and that is mostly explained by several environmental-cultural specifics.

    France is a completely different kettle of poison or fish, if you want.
    France is the victim of its own failed imperialistic dream, grandomaniac philo francophon ambitions.
    After the failure of athe post WWII colonial system France extended its voluntary “affection” to its former territories by impling and explicitely zealously campaigning for a France STILL paternally “concerned” for its “enfants’ as she actually calls her citizens – citoyens – . As a result, the children came home to roost and also to…..roast Moman France.
    The result is precisely this insurmountable crisis.
    As I am not the one who discovered the phenomenon, the locals are discussing it day in day out and they are banging their heads against wall, TV studio furniture, Parliament and Senate benches and pulpits and still unable to provide anything that would stop them looking for a way out. At least the French Jews DO have a way out. Otherwise, the ones staying put are properly scolded in their own juices at least five Michellin stars or just as properly intercorsed, whichever way you like….

Speak Your Mind

Comments received without a full name will not be considered
Email addresses are NEVER published! All comments are moderated. J-Wire will publish considered comments by people who provide a real name and email address. Comments that are abusive, rude, defamatory or which contain offensive language will not be published

    Rules on posting comments