Prime Minister: Don’t Take Diaspora Jews for Granted…writes Isi Leibler

February 17, 2014 by Isi Leibler
Read on for article

Under the leadership of the indefatigable Malcolm Hoenlein, the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, a unique umbrella organization, is gathering in Jerusalem this week.

Isi Leibler

Isi Leibler

Its members, leaders of America’s most prominent Jewish organizations, will be briefed directly by the Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and senior government ministers.

Alas, unless the unexpected happens and the Prime Minister reads the riot act to his ministers, these American activists will receive mixed messages and are likely to return to the US more confused than when they arrived.

They will be baffled by what they learn about the current round of the so-called “peace negotiations”. It now appears that Israel will accept – with major reservations – the framework accord for negotiations as a non-binding document. In contrast, the Palestinians seem poised to reject it outright. And yet, despite the Palestinian intransigence, Israel will continue to be bombarded by demands to make further concessions.

They will find it difficult to make sense of US Secretary of State John Kerry’s role in the process. Encouraged by a flow of demands and petitions from Jewish liberals urging Netanyahu to be “grateful” to Kerry and “not sit idly by” (whatever that means) and risk foregoing the opportunity for peace, Kerry has displayed a complete lack of even handedness in the negotiations. He does not pressure the Palestinians, although he has made multiple threats against Israel and proposed extreme and dangerous interventions such as substituting the IDF presence in the Jordan Valley with electronic fences and NATO troops.

Disregarding the fact that he represents Israel’s ally, he has alluded to the “dangers” of boycotts, sanctions and delegitimization unless Israel becomes more accommodating – a thinly veiled threat that we can be sure the Europeans heard.

Moreover, it was unconscionable that Kerry failed to relate to the vicious incitement of recent weeks when released Palestinian killers were sanctified as national heroes and, in many cases, actually recounted their ghoulish murders of innocent civilians on state television.

But ultimately, Netanyahu and his government bear the main burden of responsibility for the bewilderment that Diaspora Jews (and many Israelis) are experiencing over the negotiations. Whilst the Prime Minister initially robustly rejected key security concessions that Kerry demanded, he subsequently caved into pressure and papered over the differences.

Meanwhile, in absolute contradiction to the position adopted by Prime Minister Netanyahu and Defense Minister Ya’alon, Foreign Minister Lieberman – the traditional hard liner – then embarked on an “I love Kerry” campaign, preposterously suggesting that the deals proposed were the best Israel could ever expect. If Netanyahu orchestrated this as “good cop bad cop” performance, it seriously backfired. On the other hand, if the Foreign Minister is running his own mini government, that is totally unacceptable.

This confusion has had major ramifications in the US, particularly for the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), the jewel in the crown of American Israel activism. But in recent months, its reputation was tarnished and its standing weakened by failed efforts that resulted primarily from mixed signals it received.

Despite AIPAC’s strong Iranian sanction campaign (it obtained bipartisan endorsement and the backing of 59 members of the U.S. Senate, just four votes short to carry the vote), it backed down from its effort due to massive pressure from President Obama who went so far as to even misleadingly proclaim, that passage of tougher sanctions against Iran was tantamount to a declaration of war. Whilst Prime Minister Netanyahu initially encouraged AIPAC to proceed with its campaign he is also said to have pressured AIPAC to withdraw in order to placate Obama prior to their meeting in March.

AIPAC is also facing problems that are unrelated to Israel’s current lack of strategic clarity. It has become so obsessed with bipartisanship that the withdrawal of a number of Democrats made them fear a breakdown, and this is said to have also contributed to the decision to pull out its support for the initiative. In the process, AIPAC alienated and left some of its key congressional supporters out on a limb with the Republicans defiantly carrying on.

With the increasingly aggressive attitudes against Israel emerging from leftist minority groups within the Democratic Party, complex challenges are likely to arise in future which cannot always be subordinated to the interests of bipartisanship.

Nonetheless, the AIPAC debacle is symptomatic of the strained relationship between the Netanyahu government and Jewish organizations trying to support it. The government’s impulsive statements and ministers’ irresponsible public criticism and shrill outbursts have understandably exasperated even committed mainstream supporters of Israel and made them lose credibility.

Diaspora Jewish support for Israel cannot be based exclusively on the intransigence and evil of Abbas and the PA. Instead, it must articulate a broad, unifying, positive, strategic policy around which pro-Israel activists can build their cases. It should reaffirm its support of a two-state solution that reflects the desire of the vast majority of Israelis to end Israeli rule over the Arab population. It should support the retention of the major settlement blocs, as enunciated in President Bush’s letter to Prime Minister Sharon. It should state explicitly that in the regional scorpions’ den in which it exists, Israel will not compromise on defensible borders or security and should demand that its neighbors recognize its sovereignty as a Jewish nation.

The question of the future of outlying isolated settlements is a matter of contention both within Israel and in the Diaspora. Whether or not to continue construction in in outlying areas will be determined by Israelis. Should disagreements arise within the coalition, they should be debated within the cabinet, not in the pages of the Israeli and global media.

The many Diaspora Jewish activists supporting the embattled Jewish state should be treated by the government with respect. Time is of the essence. Whereas committed American Jews remain solidly supportive of Israel, many of the younger, assimilated and intermarried Jews no longer share their parents’ loyalty to Israel and are easily influenced by “progressive” ideologies and the anti-Zionist chic.

Pro-Israel American organizations may not remain so strongly supportive of Israel in the coming years if they are mishandled. The impending changing of the guard amongst American Jewry’s greying leadership may polarize these trends.  One cannot assume that the successor to Abe Foxman, the director of the ADL who recently announced his retirement, will necessarily be infused with the same passion for Israel. And who will replace Malcolm Hoenlein, who personally built and so strongly directs the Presidents Conference, when he retires? The Israeli government can no longer take the support of these organizations for granted. It must build relationships of trust with them now, or they may not be there to rely upon in the future.

Our government must provide clarity of vision and practical tools. The diaspora supporters must not be treated as puppets to be urged to take on particular positions then humiliated by provocative outbursts and government divisiveness. Israel’s global standing would benefit greatly if the raucous independent ministerial statements diverging from government policy were to be curtailed.

During the course of the forthcoming conference, perhaps American Jewish leaders could convey this message in stronger terms directly to the government ministers they will meet.

Isi Leibler lives in Jerusalem. He is a former president of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry.

Comments

2 Responses to “Prime Minister: Don’t Take Diaspora Jews for Granted…writes Isi Leibler”
  1. Otto Waldmann says:

    Let’s try and recompose the rationale in Issy’s comprehensive presentation.
    I say comprehensive because it tries to encompass all views as if they would all merge toward a logical conclusion.
    They do not and that incompatibility is supported by Issy’s own arguments.
    If, as said, the future American ( and for that matter any ) diaspora ledareship is bound to differ in its composition snd resepctive philosophical inclinations, then WHY should Israel modify her own strategies, indeed the very reason d’ettre !!! Shoiuld Israel adapt her very own existence, structure and substance in order to please a Diaspora envisaged by Issy as departing from the NECESSARY incontrovertible dedication to the perpetuation of a Jewish entity consistent ONLY with the IMMUTABLE Judaic principles. Here we must be honest about the possible – actually IMPOSSIBLE – compatibility between a diminished Jewish quality in the Diaspora ( see the primordially assimilated and even out-married Diaspora “Jewish” leadership !!!).
    Issy makes sense only in as far as pointing out how NONSENSICAL the erguments in respect to Isarel are likely to emmerge from the distant Diaspora.
    Distant in seemingly irreversible willingness to accommodate the vital LOCAL interests of a tried Israel. Will the gap widen as inevitable cultural tectonic masses depart from what we thought to be a homogenous collective neshama, Providentially unalaterable??!! Once we have arrived at that notion of INTER-anything, marriage or identity acculatuarlisation, we must conclude that Israel must relly on its own Jewishness, sadly so distinct from what this bloody Diaspora is seemingly inevitably concocting.

    Gill, once again, I must agree with you and I know that you’d rather be wrong…Same here.

  2. Gil Solomon says:

    Isi,

    I can’t believe what I’m reading. You say about Kerry: “he represents Israel’s ally.” I’ve got news for you, under the Obama administration the USA is no longer an ally. Kerry’s so called hints about boycotts, sanctions etc. should Israel not do as it’s told, are clear instructions and green lights to the Europeans on what action they should take once he gives them the nod. Same with his constant rants about the next Intifada. Abbas is not a fool and he too knows that he has been given a green light by a US Secretary of State on the next major terror campaign, should he get the “go” from Kerry.

    On Lieberman’s U Turn you say: “If Netanyahu orchestrated this as “good cop bad cop” performance, it seriously backfired. On the other hand, if the Foreign Minister is running his own mini government, that is totally unacceptable.” Hate to tell you but if Netanyahu did orchestrate this, then that is ALSO totally unacceptable from an Israeli Prime Minister. Has this man taken leave of his senses?

    You say:”Our government must provide clarity of vision” give me a break.
    How can there be clarity of vision when Netanyahu appoints for political reasons (another “serious backfire”) as his chief negotiator Tzipi Livni, a totally leftist individual who appears to have no concept that capitulation after capitulation only brings more outrageous demands? Talking about clarity of vision, Netanyahu can start by firing this woman who incidentally disgraced herself with her screeching at him in the Knesset during the recent visit by a true friend of Israel, the Canadian Prime Minister.

    What is urgently needed is a change in the electoral laws whereby ex-pat Israelis can vote in elections while overseas as allowed by all western democracies. No doubt this would be vigorously opposed by over half the Knesset who are either left wing or Arab “Israelis” who realise that these votes would not go to them.

    Israel appears to be a political basket case, run by a Government with absolutely no clarity of vision, a Government which capitulates on virtually every issue, where the media runs amok and where ministers, rather than exercise restraint, shoot their mouth off on the first thought that comes into their head, even if this is opposite to the view of the Government they represent.

    Israel cannot go on this way if it intends to survive and something serious has to be done and soon. Israel under Netanyahu appears to be like a ship without a rudder adrift on the high seas.

Speak Your Mind

Comments received without a full name will not be considered
Email addresses are NEVER published! All comments are moderated. J-Wire will publish considered comments by people who provide a real name and email address. Comments that are abusive, rude, defamatory or which contain offensive language will not be published

    Rules on posting comments