Palestine: More Straight Talking – Less Doublespeak

August 14, 2015 by David Singer
Read on for article

The well-publicised “secret meeting” recently held in Jordan between Israel’s newest negotiations Minister Silvan Shalom and perennial PLO chief negotiator Saeb Erekat is but the latest in a 20 years old meaningless talk fest that has seen little tangible signs of ending the 100 years old Jewish-Arab conflict – despite two offers made by Israel in 2000/2001 and 2008 and rejected by the Palestinian Authority…writes David Singer.

Talks have been conducted on Israel’s side within a framework comprising the 1993 Oslo Accords and the 2003 Bush Roadmap (with 14 documented Israeli reservations.)

Mahmoud Abbas’s approach to those Israeli reservations should have sounded alarm bells from the start:

“They don’t interest me …

We do not accept each side picking and choosing only those specific elements that are convenient for them in the road map.

“The map was prepared last December and we accepted it, despite our own comments and reservations. We wanted to give this initiative a chance, but it’s impossible to continue inventing comments and reservations after it was submitted.”

One of Israel’s reservations stated:

“In connection to both the introductory statements and the final settlement, declared references must be made to Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish state and to the waiver of any right of return for Palestinian refugees to the State of Israel.

Abbas’s consistent refusal to accept these terms from the outset has seen the negotiations reduced to a farce.

Those proponents of the two-state solution who continue to allow Abbas to maintain this rejectionist stance are actively contributing to its demise.

The Roadmap further states unequivocally:

“A two state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict will only be achieved through an end to violence and terrorism, when the Palestinian people have a leadership acting decisively against terror and willing and able to build a practicing democracy based on tolerance and liberty, and through Israel’s readiness to do what is necessary for a democratic Palestinian state to be established….”

Those do-gooders particularly in the European Union and the United States still supporting the “two-state solution” seem to have lost sight of this clearly agreed democratic destination.

Democracy in any projected Palestinian State has been shoved under the carpet and out of sight – without a whimper from the world’s democracies.

Any signs of democracy are noticeably absent in both the West Bank and Gaza – where elections for the President have not been held since 2005, parliamentary elections were last held in 2006 and no single government exercises authority in both areas.

Tongue-tied Western democracies make no objection to this farcical state of affairs – guaranteeing continuing negotiations remain a diplomatic joke.

Another Israeli reservation consigned to the garbage bin by Abbas was allowed to pass without comment or objection by the Western democracies:

“The character of the provisional Palestinian state will be determined through negotiations between the Palestinian Authority and Israel.

The Palestinian Authority no longer exists – having been disbanded on 3 January 2013.

By Decree number 1 for 2013 – Abbas unilaterally tore up the Oslo Accords:

“Official documents, seals, signs and letterheads of the Palestinian National Authority official and national institutions shall be amended by replacing the name ‘Palestinian National Authority’ whenever it appears by the name ‘State of Palestine’ and by adopting the emblem of the State of Palestine.”

Negotiating parameters established between identified parties pursuant to Security Council Resolution 242, the Oslo Accords and the Bush Roadmap have been replaced by a set of fictitious propositions lacking negotiating partners.

Western democracies supporting this disingenuous state of affairs should hang their heads in shame. Unless they engage in more straight talking and less doublespeak – any negotiated two-state solution will remain pure fantasy.

David Singer is a Sydney Lawyer and Foundation Member of the International Analysts Network

Comments

2 Responses to “Palestine: More Straight Talking – Less Doublespeak”
  1. Paul Winter says:

    Well David, you surprise me; now most pleasantly. Beautifully set out!

    Could you – or anyone else – guess why, in the name of all that is sane, Israel fails to retake Gaza, Judea and Samaria, and kicks out any surviving PA and Hamas functionaries?

    As you so carefully detail, if the PA is no more, then neither is its “police”, its administrators, its executive or its Hamas controlled legislature. They are hostiles in Israeli controlled areas under false pretences.

    These people must go like the Sudetenland Germans and they must take with them any Arab who remains hostile. Sinai has lots of empty areas and the Syrian ceasefire line is porous.

    • Danny Kidron says:

      The reason Israel fails to liberate the Muslim occupied Jewish lands of Aza, Shomron and Yehuda is not so much an Israel or Jewish failure, it is the historic failure of all the Western Democracies. All have lost the understanding of what war is.

      The allies of WWII which you mention, won the war against the Nazi juggernaut by applying total war, not by depleting or weakening but by totally destroying the enemy and accepting nothing less than unconditional surrender.

      When confronting evil there is but one course to take and that is not negotiating or agreeing to a ceasefire when the enemy begs for one.

      It is possible to destroy ISIS. It is possible to bring Iran to its knees. It is possible to completely liberate the Muslim occupied Jewish Lands. America, Europe, Israel, are all more than powerful enough to do that. In a very short time. In a very violent short time. But we have lost the will to do so. Not just Israel but all of us, lead on by the left, by academia, by the ideology of multiculturalism. By the reluctance to win.

      From the Torah we learn that when confronting an evil enemy it must be completely destroyed – down to the last cow. When Israel didn’t do so, G-d chastised it.

      Imagine 1935, shortly after 20 million WWI dead: in a Paris cafe discussion about Hitler and Churchill, one fellow suggested that before the coming war is over, the allies will have to kill 18 million Germans. “Impossible”. “No, we are not savages, we cannot do that”

      It is 1935 again but there is no Churchill or Roosevelt or Truman to lead us. .

Speak Your Mind

Comments received without a full name will not be considered
Email addresses are NEVER published! All comments are moderated. J-Wire will publish considered comments by people who provide a real name and email address. Comments that are abusive, rude, defamatory or which contain offensive language will not be published

    Rules on posting comments