<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Naomi Chazan, the NIF and the ZCV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jwire.com.au/news/naomi-chazan-the-nif-and-the-zcv/7048/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jwire.com.au/news/naomi-chazan-the-nif-and-the-zcv/7048</link>
	<description>Jewish Online News from Australia and New Zealand</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 02:40:49 +1000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Danny Lamm responds to Nathan Cherny. &#124; J-Wire</title>
		<link>http://www.jwire.com.au/news/naomi-chazan-the-nif-and-the-zcv/7048/comment-page-1#comment-796</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Lamm responds to Nathan Cherny. &#124; J-Wire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 07:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jwire.com.au/?p=7048#comment-796</guid>
		<description>[...] which NIF head Naomi Chazan was due to speak. His position was criticised by Melbourne-born Israeli Nathan Cherny. Danny Lamm [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] which NIF head Naomi Chazan was due to speak. His position was criticised by Melbourne-born Israeli Nathan Cherny. Danny Lamm [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sid Vicious</title>
		<link>http://www.jwire.com.au/news/naomi-chazan-the-nif-and-the-zcv/7048/comment-page-1#comment-795</link>
		<dc:creator>Sid Vicious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 02:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jwire.com.au/?p=7048#comment-795</guid>
		<description>Larry. The only smear I could see was the one that equates Israel with Apartheid. You make the call and then you tell us you&#039;re uncomfortable with the use of the term. Yet you still publish the smear. You&#039;re the true practitioner of Apartheid because you rush to condemn Israel but remain silent about the horrendous conduct of the rest of the neighbourhood. Discrimination anyone?

But the main issue I have with the Apartheid libel is that your mudslinging achieves nothing to bring about peace and reconciliation between Israel and her neighbours. I do a lot of work in the dispute resolution field and I can tell you that engaging in malicious attacks blaming one side is detrimental to achieving a successful outcome. 

So what are you really trying to achieve?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Larry. The only smear I could see was the one that equates Israel with Apartheid. You make the call and then you tell us you&#8217;re uncomfortable with the use of the term. Yet you still publish the smear. You&#8217;re the true practitioner of Apartheid because you rush to condemn Israel but remain silent about the horrendous conduct of the rest of the neighbourhood. Discrimination anyone?</p>
<p>But the main issue I have with the Apartheid libel is that your mudslinging achieves nothing to bring about peace and reconciliation between Israel and her neighbours. I do a lot of work in the dispute resolution field and I can tell you that engaging in malicious attacks blaming one side is detrimental to achieving a successful outcome. </p>
<p>So what are you really trying to achieve?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Stillman</title>
		<link>http://www.jwire.com.au/news/naomi-chazan-the-nif-and-the-zcv/7048/comment-page-1#comment-792</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Stillman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jwire.com.au/?p=7048#comment-792</guid>
		<description>Paul, I think I will leave NIF to defend itself as it well can.  But sedition? That&#039;s a bit rich

As for South Africa, I think I&#039;ve had enough direct experience of South Africa and close reading of Sth African history to know that Israel and SA are not the same, thank goodness, but there are disturbing signs in Israel of deliberate and institutionalised discrimination. If you actually read what I have said in my galus article, I had a got at a number of other countries as well.  Ethnic pride doesn&#039;t justify endemic discrimination and inequality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul, I think I will leave NIF to defend itself as it well can.  But sedition? That&#8217;s a bit rich</p>
<p>As for South Africa, I think I&#8217;ve had enough direct experience of South Africa and close reading of Sth African history to know that Israel and SA are not the same, thank goodness, but there are disturbing signs in Israel of deliberate and institutionalised discrimination. If you actually read what I have said in my galus article, I had a got at a number of other countries as well.  Ethnic pride doesn&#8217;t justify endemic discrimination and inequality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Winter</title>
		<link>http://www.jwire.com.au/news/naomi-chazan-the-nif-and-the-zcv/7048/comment-page-1#comment-791</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Winter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 12:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jwire.com.au/?p=7048#comment-791</guid>
		<description>Cherny engages in a great deal of dissembling. He carefully avoids Im Tirtzu&#039;s criticism of the NIF: that 92% of Goldstone&#039;s report was based on NIF disinformation. 

It is as irrelevant that NIF does good deeds like striving for equality in schools, as it is that Hamas conducts welfare activities among its poor; poor hangers on, tht is.

The poing is that it is a foreign funded organisation which in turn funds left wing ati-Israel/anti-Zionist groups and undermines the security and reputation of the country. Im Tirtzu validly criticises NIF&#039;s sedition.

The problem with left wing ideologues is that they see themselves a part of a humanity and as long as they have it easy and are accepted by the &quot;lovies&quot;, they could not give a damn about fellow Jews or their own past. They are more than happy to destroy an Israel that does not live up to their standards. And influenced by &quot;the movement&quot;, they blind themselves to the utterly horrible jihadists that have been waging war on the Jewish state for over six decades. The unconditional Christian love and forgiveness that they show to the  mohammedans, they withhold from Jews fighting an existential battle, a state in the front lines of jihad against the West and the 21st century. A jihad, that if lost, would deny them the freedoms they misuse in denigrating Israel.

As for Stillman&#039;s scurrilous comments about Israeli apartheid, I suggest that he learns a bit more about the SA system before misapplying that term to Israel. There are inequalities is all societies and when only the Jewish state is criticised for those, then such a description is antisemitic. About par for the course for Jews proud to be ashamed to be Jews.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cherny engages in a great deal of dissembling. He carefully avoids Im Tirtzu&#8217;s criticism of the NIF: that 92% of Goldstone&#8217;s report was based on NIF disinformation. </p>
<p>It is as irrelevant that NIF does good deeds like striving for equality in schools, as it is that Hamas conducts welfare activities among its poor; poor hangers on, tht is.</p>
<p>The poing is that it is a foreign funded organisation which in turn funds left wing ati-Israel/anti-Zionist groups and undermines the security and reputation of the country. Im Tirtzu validly criticises NIF&#8217;s sedition.</p>
<p>The problem with left wing ideologues is that they see themselves a part of a humanity and as long as they have it easy and are accepted by the &#8220;lovies&#8221;, they could not give a damn about fellow Jews or their own past. They are more than happy to destroy an Israel that does not live up to their standards. And influenced by &#8220;the movement&#8221;, they blind themselves to the utterly horrible jihadists that have been waging war on the Jewish state for over six decades. The unconditional Christian love and forgiveness that they show to the  mohammedans, they withhold from Jews fighting an existential battle, a state in the front lines of jihad against the West and the 21st century. A jihad, that if lost, would deny them the freedoms they misuse in denigrating Israel.</p>
<p>As for Stillman&#8217;s scurrilous comments about Israeli apartheid, I suggest that he learns a bit more about the SA system before misapplying that term to Israel. There are inequalities is all societies and when only the Jewish state is criticised for those, then such a description is antisemitic. About par for the course for Jews proud to be ashamed to be Jews.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Stillman</title>
		<link>http://www.jwire.com.au/news/naomi-chazan-the-nif-and-the-zcv/7048/comment-page-1#comment-786</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Stillman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 23:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jwire.com.au/?p=7048#comment-786</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s nothing like smears to raise the level of discussion in the Jewish Community Sid. You appear not to have really got the point of Nathan&#039;s article, since it is organizations like Bteslem which highlight discrimination, racism,  and enforced separation in Israel and the territories, often on spurious grounds. The Zionist dream has gone very sour.

You are referring to my piece in Galus Australis I assume, in which I said. I can only summarize my article in a couple of sentences. 

I am very uncomfortable in using the word apartheid, and that is what I say in the article. I wish there was another term.  If you want, we could say &#039;separate and unequal&#039;, which has strong historical resonance in the US dues to the ruling of the Supreme Court there in the late 1890s, but nowhere else.  All the evidence is that that there is a terrible trend towards the legitimization of &#039;separate and unequal&#039;, that has less to do with matters of security, and more to do with dominance of one group over another. This flies in the face of a human rights approach to citizenship.

There is also concern that if the far right had its own way, the situation would certainly resemble if not South Africa, a pretty terrible place.  I am looking for more nuance here. I am not saying it is  exactly like South Africa, but it is showing disturbing signs of a permanent, legislated separation of peoples into deliberately unequal populations. Some would claim it has always been like that.   I don’t make that claim, but rather, this is the outcome of a policy of occupation and colonization on top of a Zionism that never really came to  terms with the historical rights and presence of another people.

Where I differ, I think, with anti-Zionists/Israel people is that I recognise that  population movements are part of history, and we see the effects in particular, in places like the Balkans and Palestine.  Jews came to Palestine  (some would say back to Palestine) for all sorts of reasons, and have met resistance ever since. The solution has to be compromise, and I wish this for both Israeli Jew, Israeli Palestinians and Palestinians in the Territories, as well as the Palestinian Diaspora.  It also means moving down the path of reconciliation (as has happened in a number of countries, though the path has been tough.   This will also require comprises on the part of Diaspora Jews Diaspora Palestinians for the sake of peace.   The other great factor is whether or not the US will keep bankrolling Israeli.

Institutionalizing separation, whether whatever it is labelled is an affront to Jewish history and human rights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s nothing like smears to raise the level of discussion in the Jewish Community Sid. You appear not to have really got the point of Nathan&#8217;s article, since it is organizations like Bteslem which highlight discrimination, racism,  and enforced separation in Israel and the territories, often on spurious grounds. The Zionist dream has gone very sour.</p>
<p>You are referring to my piece in Galus Australis I assume, in which I said. I can only summarize my article in a couple of sentences. </p>
<p>I am very uncomfortable in using the word apartheid, and that is what I say in the article. I wish there was another term.  If you want, we could say &#8217;separate and unequal&#8217;, which has strong historical resonance in the US dues to the ruling of the Supreme Court there in the late 1890s, but nowhere else.  All the evidence is that that there is a terrible trend towards the legitimization of &#8217;separate and unequal&#8217;, that has less to do with matters of security, and more to do with dominance of one group over another. This flies in the face of a human rights approach to citizenship.</p>
<p>There is also concern that if the far right had its own way, the situation would certainly resemble if not South Africa, a pretty terrible place.  I am looking for more nuance here. I am not saying it is  exactly like South Africa, but it is showing disturbing signs of a permanent, legislated separation of peoples into deliberately unequal populations. Some would claim it has always been like that.   I don’t make that claim, but rather, this is the outcome of a policy of occupation and colonization on top of a Zionism that never really came to  terms with the historical rights and presence of another people.</p>
<p>Where I differ, I think, with anti-Zionists/Israel people is that I recognise that  population movements are part of history, and we see the effects in particular, in places like the Balkans and Palestine.  Jews came to Palestine  (some would say back to Palestine) for all sorts of reasons, and have met resistance ever since. The solution has to be compromise, and I wish this for both Israeli Jew, Israeli Palestinians and Palestinians in the Territories, as well as the Palestinian Diaspora.  It also means moving down the path of reconciliation (as has happened in a number of countries, though the path has been tough.   This will also require comprises on the part of Diaspora Jews Diaspora Palestinians for the sake of peace.   The other great factor is whether or not the US will keep bankrolling Israeli.</p>
<p>Institutionalizing separation, whether whatever it is labelled is an affront to Jewish history and human rights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sid Vicious</title>
		<link>http://www.jwire.com.au/news/naomi-chazan-the-nif-and-the-zcv/7048/comment-page-1#comment-783</link>
		<dc:creator>Sid Vicious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 11:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jwire.com.au/?p=7048#comment-783</guid>
		<description>Congratulations Nathan. The last time I read something from your first correspondent Larry Stillman, he was accusing Israel of being an &quot;Apartheid State&quot;. Your eloquent narrative and his endorsement of your words proves beyond all doubt that he is very much mistaken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations Nathan. The last time I read something from your first correspondent Larry Stillman, he was accusing Israel of being an &#8220;Apartheid State&#8221;. Your eloquent narrative and his endorsement of your words proves beyond all doubt that he is very much mistaken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whispering_jack</title>
		<link>http://www.jwire.com.au/news/naomi-chazan-the-nif-and-the-zcv/7048/comment-page-1#comment-782</link>
		<dc:creator>Whispering_jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 10:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jwire.com.au/?p=7048#comment-782</guid>
		<description>Nathan, I am pleased to hear all of the wonderful things that the NIF does to enhance Israel life and Israeli society. The work that you do to assist those segments of the community that are often neglected in mainstream funding such as the work that is done with Israel&#039;s Arab citizens and its Palestinian neighbours.

I am concerned however, with the politicisation of the NIF issue and the name calling and finger pointing on both sides. I believe that most of us are concerned that funds donated in good faith to Israel do not end up in the hands of those who seek to deligitimise the Zionist dream and who wish to endanger Israeli lives by weakening the state. 

These are questions that have rightly or wrongly been posed by this controversy and which I believe deserve an answer. I don&#039;t believe you have done this in your otherwise excellent piece.

I also hold a great deal of respect for Naomi Chazan and have done for some time. However, I believe that in the current circumstances, her visit was untenable. The good news is that it&#039;s been postponed, not cancelled and there is every chance that we will have the opportunity to see and hear her in person some time soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nathan, I am pleased to hear all of the wonderful things that the NIF does to enhance Israel life and Israeli society. The work that you do to assist those segments of the community that are often neglected in mainstream funding such as the work that is done with Israel&#8217;s Arab citizens and its Palestinian neighbours.</p>
<p>I am concerned however, with the politicisation of the NIF issue and the name calling and finger pointing on both sides. I believe that most of us are concerned that funds donated in good faith to Israel do not end up in the hands of those who seek to deligitimise the Zionist dream and who wish to endanger Israeli lives by weakening the state. </p>
<p>These are questions that have rightly or wrongly been posed by this controversy and which I believe deserve an answer. I don&#8217;t believe you have done this in your otherwise excellent piece.</p>
<p>I also hold a great deal of respect for Naomi Chazan and have done for some time. However, I believe that in the current circumstances, her visit was untenable. The good news is that it&#8217;s been postponed, not cancelled and there is every chance that we will have the opportunity to see and hear her in person some time soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Spigelman</title>
		<link>http://www.jwire.com.au/news/naomi-chazan-the-nif-and-the-zcv/7048/comment-page-1#comment-780</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Spigelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 05:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jwire.com.au/?p=7048#comment-780</guid>
		<description>Nathan Cherny  has elquently expressed a view we strongly support. Rachel and I do not support most of the findings of the Gladstone report never the less we feel it must be answered and not ignored. 

However the NIF is an important body in trying to correct many of the wrongs in our society- it should not be silenced by people whose knowledge of its activities and functions are superficial at best. 

We hope this &quot;new&quot; information will lead to a re think by the Melbourne community as Nathan expressed it is veery important that the diaspora supports Israeli  society as a whole and not just those on the far right right as the current actions appear to suggest. We are struggling here to support a fully democratic society do not let Melbourne become the voice of those elements that endevour to stifle debate in our country.

Rachel and Mark Spigelman</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nathan Cherny  has elquently expressed a view we strongly support. Rachel and I do not support most of the findings of the Gladstone report never the less we feel it must be answered and not ignored. </p>
<p>However the NIF is an important body in trying to correct many of the wrongs in our society- it should not be silenced by people whose knowledge of its activities and functions are superficial at best. </p>
<p>We hope this &#8220;new&#8221; information will lead to a re think by the Melbourne community as Nathan expressed it is veery important that the diaspora supports Israeli  society as a whole and not just those on the far right right as the current actions appear to suggest. We are struggling here to support a fully democratic society do not let Melbourne become the voice of those elements that endevour to stifle debate in our country.</p>
<p>Rachel and Mark Spigelman</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Stillman</title>
		<link>http://www.jwire.com.au/news/naomi-chazan-the-nif-and-the-zcv/7048/comment-page-1#comment-779</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Stillman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 05:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jwire.com.au/?p=7048#comment-779</guid>
		<description>Excellent points Nathan.

Kol ha kavod.  Unfortunately, I believe that you will be attacked too, for not being a patriot, by people who have been captured by an increasingly scary, right-wing agenda that belongs in the former Balkans, but also, by a community that is kept in a deliberately stoked state of anxiety.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent points Nathan.</p>
<p>Kol ha kavod.  Unfortunately, I believe that you will be attacked too, for not being a patriot, by people who have been captured by an increasingly scary, right-wing agenda that belongs in the former Balkans, but also, by a community that is kept in a deliberately stoked state of anxiety.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
