Netanyahu responds to Kerry’s speech

December 29, 2016 Agencies
Read on for article

Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says he has “deep disappointment” with John Kerry’s speech condemning a policy of enabling Jews to live in Jerusalem.“Before why I explain why this speech was so disappointing to millions of Israelis, I want to say that Israel is deeply grateful to the


U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry (right) sits with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as they address reporters June 27, 2016, at the U.S. Ambassador’s Residence in Rome, Italy. Credit: U.S. State Department.
U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry (right) sits with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as they address reporters June 27, 2016, at the U.S. Ambassador’s Residence in Rome, Italy. Credit: U.S. State Department.

United States of America, to successive American administrations, to the American Congress, to the American people. We’re grateful for the support Israel has received over many, many decades. Our alliance is based on shared values, shared interests, a sense of shared destiny and a partnership that has endured differences of opinions between our two governments over the best way to advance peace and stability in the Middle East. I have no doubt that our alliance will endure the profound disagreement we have had with the Obama Administration and will become even stronger in the future.

But now I must express my deep disappointment with the speech today of John Kerry – a speech that was almost as unbalanced as the anti-Israel resolution passed at the UN last week. In a speech ostensibly about peace between Israelis and Palestinians, Secretary Kerry paid lip service to the unremitting campaign of terrorism that has been waged by the Palestinians against the Jewish state for nearly a century.

What he did was to spend most of his speech blaming Israel for the lack of peace by passionately condemning a policy of enabling Jews to live in their historic homeland and in their eternal capital, Jerusalem.

Hundreds of suicide bombings, thousand, tens of thousands of rockets, millions of Israelis in bomb shelters are not throwaway lines in a speech; they’re the realities that the people of Israel had to endure because of mistaken policies, policies that at the time won the thunderous applause of the world. I don’t seek applause; I seek the security, and peace, and prosperity and the future of the Jewish state. The Jewish people have sought their place under the sun for 3,000 years, and we’re not about to be swayed by mistaken policies that have caused great, great damage.

Israelis do not need to be lectured about the importance of peace by foreign leaders. Israel’s hand has been extended in peace to its neighbors from day one, from its very first day. We’ve prayed for peace, we’ve worked for it every day since then. And thousands of Israeli families have made the ultimate sacrifice to defend our country and advance peace.

My family has been one of them; there are many, many others.

No one wants peace more than the people of Israel. Israel remains committed to resolving the outstanding differences between us and the Palestinians through direct negotiations. This is how we made peace with Egypt; this is how we made peace with Jordan; it’s the only way we’ll make peace with the Palestinians. That has always been Israel’s policy; that has always been America’s policy.

Here’s what President Obama himself said at the UN in 2011. He said: ‘Peace is hard work. Peace will not come through statements and resolutions at the United Nations. If it were that easy, it would have been accomplished by now.’

That’s what President Obama said, and he was right. And until last week this was repeated over and over again as American policy. Secretary Kerry said that the United States cannot vote against its own policy. But that’s exactly what it did at the UN, and that’s why Israel opposed last week’s Security Council resolution, because it effectively calls the Western Wall ‘occupied Palestinian Territory,’ because it encourages boycotts and sanctions against Israel – that’s what it effectively does, and because it reflects a radical shift in US policy towards the Palestinians on final status issues – those issues that we always agreed, the US and Israel, have to be negotiated directly, face to face without preconditions.

That shift happened despite the Palestinians walking away from peace and from peace offers time and time again, despite their refusal to even negotiate peace for the past eight years, and despite the Palestinian Authority inculcating a culture of hatred towards Israel in an entire generation of young Palestinians.

Israel looks forward to working with President-elect Trump and with the American Congress, Democrats and Republicans alike, to mitigate the damage that this resolution has done and ultimately, to repeal it.

Israel hopes that the outgoing Obama Administration will prevent any more damage being done to Israel at the UN in its waning days. I wish I could be comforted by the promise that the US says we will not bring any more resolutions to the UN. That’s what they said about the previous resolution. We have it on absolutely incontestable evidence that the United States organized, advanced and brought this resolution to the United Nations Security Council. We’ll share that information with the incoming administration. Some of it is sensitive, it’s all true. You saw some of it in the protocol released in an Egyptian paper. There’s plenty more; it’s the tip of the iceberg.

So they say, but we didn’t bring it. And they could take John Kerry’s speech with the six points. It could be raised in the French international conference a few days from now and then brought to the UN. So France will bring it, or Sweden – not a noted friend of Israel – could bring it. And the United States could say, well, we can’t vote against our own policy, we’ve just annunciated it.

I think the United States, if it’s true to its word, or at least if it’s now true to its word, should now come out and say we will not allow any resolutions, any more resolutions in the Security Council on Israel. Period. Not we will bring or not bring – we will not allow any, and stop this game, the charades.

I think that the decisions that are vital to Israel’s interests and the future of its children, they won’t be made through speeches in Washington or votes in the United Nations or conferences in Paris. They’ll be made by the Government of Israel around the negotiating table, making them on behalf of the one and only Jewish state – a sovereign nation that is the master of its own fate.

And one final thought – I personally know the pain, the loss and the suffering of war. That’s why I’m so committed to peace. Because for anyone who’s experienced it, as I have, war and terror are horrible. I want young Palestinian children to be educated like our children, for peace. But they’re not educated for peace. The Palestinian Authority educates them to lionize terrorists and to murder Israelis.

My vision is that Israelis and Palestinians both have a future of mutual recognition, of dignity, mutual respect, co-existence. But the Palestinian Authority tells them that they will never accept, should never accept the existence of a Jewish state.

So, I ask you, how can you make peace with someone who rejects your very existence?
See, this conflict is not about houses, or communities in the West Bank, Judea and Samaria, the Gaza district or anywhere else. This conflict is and has always been about Israel’s very right to exist. That’s why my hundreds of calls to sit with President Abbas for peace talks have gone unanswered. That’s why my invitation to him to come to the Knesset was never answered. That’s why the Palestinian government continues to pay anyone who murders Israelis a monthly salary.

The persistent Palestinian refusal to recognize a Jewish state remains the core of the conflict and its removal is the key to peace.

Palestinian rejection of Israel and support for terror are what the nations of the world should focus on if they truly want to advance peace, and I can only express my regret and say that it’s a shame that Secretary Kerry does not see this simple truth.”

Read Kerry’s prepared text:

Comments

5 Responses to “Netanyahu responds to Kerry’s speech”
  1. Liat Kirby-Nagar says:

    Well, Adrian, you’ve certainly told me who you are, but apart from your assumption that I’m a ‘prolific blogger’, what do you know about me? Nothing is the answer. So why do you assume you measure up in superior mode against me? Or is the assumption that your words must perhaps count for more an innate response to the fact that I’m female perhaps? Perhaps I’m older than you, too – what is it about my comments that speaks to the fact that I’m a younger woman?

    I haven’t served with the ADF, but have been a small businesswoman, amongst other things that have required discipline and a working intelligence. I am also politically savvy, as you say. I think we’re probably fairly evenly matched if you believe measurement of that kind matters.

    Most certainly you may say what you want to say. That’s what this site is all about, people expressing their opinions. And people debating them. You could take me up on any of my comments directed to you, especially my questions, and shoot me down in flames with specific argument against them if you can do so. But there’s no need for aggression, a sense of inflated sense of self or personal attack.

  2. Adrian Jackson says:

    Liat – because I can and I have not read it why; would I.

    You say what you want to say and I will say what I want to say – got it.

    This 64 year old political savvy, former ADF infantry officer and small businessman does not need to be lectured by a prolific blogger like you.

  3. Liat Kirby-Nagar says:

    Adrian Jackson,
    How can you, in all reason, make these comments after reading Netanyahu’s response to Kerry’s speech?

    Is your idea of maintaining friendship with other nations to be sycophantic, to align with ideas and policies that mean annihilation? Do you really think that true friendship (of nation or individual) means continual appeasement against one’s own interests?

    The horrific simplicity of the situation lies in Netanyahu’s question: ‘So, I ask you, how can you make peace with someone who rejects your very existence?

    The situation now exists globally, where more and more countries are willing, or eager, to negate the existence of a Jewish State and to use all within their means to do so. Are these the ‘friends’ you are concerned at losing?

  4. Adrian Jackson says:

    The PM of Israel and his ultra right wing cabinet have brought this in themselves.

    Does Israel have any friends now, other than Trump?

  5. Adrian Jackson says:

    I listened to Kerry’s speech on ABC radio today.

    The Israel government is sure getting many countries off side.

    Israel appears to have no friends now.

Speak Your Mind

Comments received without a full name will not be considered
Email addresses are NEVER published! All comments are moderated. J-Wire will publish considered comments by people who provide a real name and email address. Comments that are abusive, rude, defamatory or which contain offensive language will not be published

    Rules on posting comments