Israeli Sovereignty over Jewish Jerusalem

November 24, 2011 by Isi Leibler
Read on for article

The ongoing pressures exerted against construction in Jewish neighborhoods of Jerusalem such as Gilo reflect intensified global efforts to redivide the city…writes Isi Leibler.

Isi Leibler

Like many aspects of the Israeli-Arab conflict, the issue of Jerusalem is being reviewed in a vacuum without relationship to the reality on the ground. It also overlooks the abominable restrictions on freedom of worship in East Jerusalem between 1948 and 1967 when the city was under Jordanian control. Jewish holy sites including the 2000 year-old Jewish cemetery at the Mount of Olives were desecrated with  tombstones used to build latrines, and all 58 synagogues in the old city including the ancient Hurva synagogue, were razed to the ground.

The uninhibitedly anti-Semitic Jordanian Military Governor of the Old City, Abdulla el Tal, proudly proclaimed that “for the first time in 1000 years, not a single Jew remains in the Jewish quarter….and as not a single building remains intact, this makes the return of the Jews here impossible”. Christians were also maltreated, with over 60% of them emigrating from Jerusalem during that period.

Yet, since the reunification of the city in 1967 following Israel’s defeat of the combined Arab assault, complete freedom of religion was immediately extended to all citizens of Jerusalem.

In addition, universities, hospitals and social service facilities provided absolutely equal services to Jew and Arab alike. One need only visit any of the major hospitals in Jerusalem to verify the extraordinary high standard of health benefits that unification provided for Arab residents.

Ironically, Jews today are the ones being discriminated against by their own government in their own capital. In 1967, immediately after the liberation of Jerusalem, Moshe Dayan effectively handed over the keys of the Temple Mount to the Muslim Wakf (religious authority) who retained total control and jurisdiction over this extensive area which includes the holiest Jewish site in the world. It proved to be a disastrous blunder. The situation was further aggravated by the rabbinate, which on halachic grounds, prohibited Jews from visiting the holy site. However, today many national religious rabbis maintain that Jews are entitled to visit most of the area and even consider it a mitzvah to pray there.

On a recent visit to the Temple Mount, I was astonished to observe the bizarre spectacle of Jews being bundled off by Israeli police in co-operation with the Wakf for quietly engaging in private prayer. I was informed that some Jews who were seen praying are permanently prohibited from visiting the area. This is scandalous. For Israeli police to deny Jews the right to pray at their holiest site in their own capital because it offends Moslem sensitivities is surely outrageous. It amounts to practicing inverse discrimination, denying the same freedom of worship to our own people which we take pride in guaranteeing to others.

This chaotic arrangement also provided fuel to Palestinians to initiate a massive exercise in historical revisionism in order to bolster their false narrative. They are now frenziedly attempting to deny the Jewish links to Jerusalem and make the preposterous allegation that the Jewish relationship to Jerusalem was effectively a Zionist fabrication designed to justify the “invasion” of Palestine. It is a form of revisionism no less obscene than Holocaust denial and has emerged as a central tenet of hostile Palestinian nationalism.

As late as the 1930s, even Moslem Council guidebooks identified Solomon’s Temple on the site. It was only since 1954 that such references were expunged. In 2000, at the Camp David meeting, Arafat stunned President Clinton by declaring that “Solomon’s Temple was not in Jerusalem. But in Nablus”. On another occasion he said it was in Yemen. Others, like PA spokesman Saeb Erekat, alleged that “the issue of the Temple… is a Jewish invention lacking any basis”. President Abbas now repeatedly dismisses any Jewish link to the Holy Land and the PA Ministry of Information website describes the Jewish connection to Jerusalem as a “biblical myth”. Sari Nusseibeh claimed that “the historical ties and attachments of the Palestinians precede any Israeli claim to Jerusalem”. These expressions were recently extended to even include denial of a Jewish link to the Western Wall.

Only last week, Ahmed Al-Tayib, the Sheikh of Cairo’s Al-Azhar University, the principal global religious authority for Sunni Muslims, warned that the continued “Judaization” of Jerusalem, which he claimed had originally been constructed by Arabs, would result in the annihilation of “the Zionist entity in Palestine”.

In addition, we are witnessing a systematic ongoing course of wanton destruction in which bulldozers have been employed on the Temple Mount by the Palestinian Wakf in order to eliminate ancient Jewish archaeological evidence and yet, despite protests and expressions of outrage from most Israeli archeologists, the government has refused to intervene.

The links of the Jewish people to Jerusalem are at the very core of our national and spiritual history and identity. For over 2000 years of exile we yearned and prayed for a return to Jerusalem and since 1800 Jews have constituted the majority of the population of Jerusalem.

It is noteworthy that Yitzhak Rabin’s last speech prior to his assassination pledged to the Knesset that Jerusalem would never again be divided.

Yet the sad truth is that in addition to condemning any construction in Jewish Jerusalem as “undermining the peace process”, neither the United States nor the Europeans have even recognized Israeli sovereignty over West Jerusalem.

There is no doubt that were any areas of Jerusalem ever to fall under Palestinian jurisdiction, the despicable discriminatory practices applied by the Jordanians until 1967, would be reintroduced.  Abu Mazen has already publicly proclaimed that not a single Jew would be permitted to live in any future Palestinian State.

It is also inconceivable that neighborhoods like Ramot, Gilo, French Hill, Ramat Eshkol, and Givat Zeev will ever be seceded from Israel. No power could evacuate over 100,000 Jews from these areas.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel allegedly criticized Netanyahu recently in relation to the announcement of new construction in Gilo, but in view of her personal Berlin background she should be sensitive of the highly negative aspects of dividing a city. Although it will never happen, greater autonomy and allocation of municipal duties could be extended to Arabs in areas in which they comprise the majority of inhabitants.

Interestingly, a recent poll conducted by the Palestinian Center for Public Opinion, demonstrated that 59% of Arab residents in Jerusalem were satisfied with their standard of living and that the majority strongly objected to dividing the city and living under PA jurisdiction. In fact, as many as 40% stated that if the city was divided, they would prefer to move to an Israeli neighborhood rather than fall under the authority of the corrupt Palestinian Authority and possibly eventually find themselves under Hamas control.

 

Isi Leibler lives in Jerusalem. He is a former president of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry.

Comments

11 Responses to “Israeli Sovereignty over Jewish Jerusalem”
  1. Gillian says:

    The Palestinians claim that East Jerusalem belongs to them but how can it if it was Jordanian? If Jordan is not claiming the land and the land which was offered to the Arabs was rejected by them then they have no legal claim to it (confirmed in an international court in 1974). So there is no reason why it should not stay in Israel’s possession where it is well taken care of and available to all.

    • ben says:

      The land was not offerd to the Arabs. It was colonised by the British and offerd to the Zionists, courtesy the Balfour declaration. The Arabs were the indigenous population of the land.

      • Danny Ginges says:

        The land was offered to the Arabs in 1937, 1947, 2001 and 2008 and rejected by the Arabs on each occasion. Jerusalem had a Jewish majority before the Balfour declaration, and Jews (the name Jew is derived from Judea in the West Bank) were indigenous to the land thousands of years before Arabs (who are indigenous to Arabia, hence the name Arab) began their murderous conquest of the Middle East in the 7th Century.

        • ben says:

          There was always an indigenous jewish population in Jerusalem. They are the indigenous Arab Jews. Hiding behind this is no justification for colonisation. There is probably a Catholic majority in Rome;however that is no justification for Chilean or Phillipino Catholics to colonise Rome and displace the indigenous people.

          • Danny Ginges says:

            The Ottomans, who controlled the area for 500 years before the mandate, were not Arab. Some of Jerusalem’s Jews may have had Arab roots, but they were never referred to as Arab Jews. Maybe Palestinian Jews under the mandate, or just Jews before that. And of course, the 800,000 Jews expelled from Arab lands are either Sephardi or Misrachi Jews. BTW, my family lived in Jerusalem under Ottoman rule and they are not even slightly Arab. Anyway, if you’re against colonisation, why is it okay for the Arabs to colonise the entire Middle East the expense of the indigenous Christian, Jewish, Zoroastrian and Bahai populations?

          • ben says:

            So you are agreeing the Zionists are colonisres! The British promised independence to the Arabs and latter promised the land to the Zionists. The Zionists collaborated with the British in suppressing the Palestinian freedom movement. The indigenous Jews were fully integrated into Jerusalme society. Even the PLo charter acknowledges this. And the indigenous Jews continue to be a discriminated minority in Israel. The Arabs include Jews, Christians and Druze. Arab is not a religion, it is a language group.

  2. Lynne Newington says:

    The full membership of Palestine of UNESCO has taken care of all the Western Bank sites…..an overdue right for a country that has such a significant amount of heritage sites: Sydney Morning Herald November 2.
    This is what your up against and what Rome wants with it’s concessions, pandering to Men of Goodwill to get it.

  3. david singer says:

    To artcohn

    The Hurva synagogue goes back later than the 19th century.

    The synagogue was founded in the early 18th century by followers of Judah he-Hasid, but it was destroyed by Muslims a few years later in 1721. The plot lay in ruins for over 140 years and became known as the Ruin, or Hurva. In 1864, the Perushim rebuilt the synagogue, and although officially named the Beis Yaakov Synagogue, it retained its name as the Hurva. It became Jerusalem’s main Ashkenazic synagogue, until it too was reduced to rubble by the Arab Legion during the 1948 Arab–Israeli War

    As I sit typing this in the hotel lobby in Jerusalem where I am presently staying, I am surrounded by 300 Christian pilgrims from every country in the World including many from Vanuatu and New Guinea. They all fervently pray for the Jews as the rightful owners of Jerusalem. They are totally united against any division of Jerusalem.

    Travelling on the new tram that winds its way through various sections of Arab and Jewish populated areas of Jerusalem I am crushed in between Moslems, Christians and Jews – all groups comprising secular as well as religious passengers – priests, nuns, hassidim, hareidim,jeans clad, burkhas. .

    Division of Jerusalem ever again? The humanity that currently freely enjoys this amazing city in a shared sense of harmony seems to be permanently joined forever under Israeli sovereignty.

    • ben says:

      Anoth piece of spin. The synagogue was left incomplete because the pilgrims ran out of money, the architect was the Ottoman sultan’s offical architect, and the incomplete building was burnt down by the creditors. The hagannah and Zionist forces used the rebuilt synagogue as a base for their operations. The Arab League blew a hole in the wall when the Zionist forces refused to leave. The building was blown up latter, it is not clear wether the Haganah did it to kill the Arab League soldiers.

  4. Beth Hardin says:

    What is the matter with standing up and taking control of your own country??? Why can’t the Jew’s get over their inferiority complex!
    Please….someone in Jerusalem…stand up and shout “This Our My Country,” and we are taking it back,” in the Name of Yah!
    Amen

  5. artcohn says:

    Excellent, badly needed article. One flaw: the, recently re-built, Hurva synagogue is not ancient, but built in the 19th century CE.

Speak Your Mind

Comments received without a full name will not be considered
Email addresses are NEVER published! All comments are moderated. J-Wire will publish considered comments by people who provide a real name and email address. Comments that are abusive, rude, defamatory or which contain offensive language will not be published

    Rules on posting comments