ECAJ and ZFA comment on Syria and UNESCO

March 13, 2012 by Community Editor
Read on for article

The Executive Council of Australian Jewry and the Zionist Federation of Australia have criticised the decision made by UNESCO not to expel Syria from a human rights committee.The joint release states:

The ECAJ and ZFA deplore the decision made by the Executive Board of UNESCO on 8 March 2012 which, while it condemned “the continued widespread and systematic violation of human rights and fundamental freedoms by the Syrian authorities”, failed to heed the calls of the US and other Executive Board members for Syria to be expelled outright from the UNESCO Committee on Conventions and Recommendations which deals with human rights.
This UNESCO decision comes hard on the heels of reliable reports that, following their indiscriminate shelling of Baba Amr and other civilian districts in Homs, the al-Assad regime’s military forces summarily executed many of the survivors, butchering entire families, and engaged in the systematic mass rape of women.
Further reports are emerging out of Syria that the town of Irbil, another centre of anti-regime resistance, is now being subjected to similar atrocities by forces loyal to the al-Assad regime. The UN has estimated the total number of Syrians killed during the last 12 months at more than 7,500. Many others have been wounded and made homeless.
In the past fortnight, US Secretary of State Hilary Clinton, and other leading state officials have openly canvassed the possibility of Bashar al-Assad and other senior figures in the Syrian regime being referred to the International Criminal Court by the UN Security Council for possible indictment for war crimes and crimes against humanity. Yet international action against the al- Assad regime has been stymied by a deadlock in the UN Security Council.
It is reprehensible enough that the UN Security Council has abrogated its own doctrine and abandoned its responsibility to protect the people of Syria from egregious crimes that continue to be committed against them on a daily basis by their own government. It is nothing short of disgraceful that a UN body, UNESCO, has made a decision which implies that representatives of the al-Assad regime have a constructive contribution to make to the work of its human rights committee. History will record this as a new low, even for the UN.

The statement bore the names of ECAJ president Dr Danny Lamm and ZFA president Philip Chester.

Comments

2 Responses to “ECAJ and ZFA comment on Syria and UNESCO”
  1. Halina says:

    Both UNESCO decisions are deplorable.Basar Asad’s Syria shouldn’t have place in the Human Rights Committee. In view of the present situation should have been expelled from UNESCO monhs ago.
    Accepting Palestine into UNESCO as this would be a lawfully established state is plainly ridiculous. In my opinion this diminishes a status of this body and respect for UNESCO. It should be rescinded immediately. I would like to see the establishment of the proper palestinian state, but this can be achieved only in accordance with the international laws. I am not conversant with the law, but can’t accept a possibility of the creation a state which officially express the wish of destroy another state established according to all rules, and functioning lawfully for 60 years.

  2. Liat Nagar says:

    One must ask in all seriousness what is going on at UNESCO when considering this current veto of theirs in relation to expelling Syria from their Human Rights Committee in tandem with them defying their own constitutional laws by admitting Palestine as a member nation/state? Surely there should be more transparency here in regard to the background of those making these decisions together with their reasons, most especially as, as an organisation, they are funded.

Speak Your Mind

Comments received without a full name will not be considered
Email addresses are NEVER published! All comments are moderated. J-Wire will publish considered comments by people who provide a real name and email address. Comments that are abusive, rude, defamatory or which contain offensive language will not be published

Got something to say about this?

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.